Fastlink to record 327455
Showing items 1 to 1 of 1.
Full TGIF Record # 327455 Item 1 of 1 |
|
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1002/agg2.20204 |
Web URL(s): | https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: HTML5 https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: JavaScript; HTML5 https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: PDF Reader |
Publication Type: | Refereed |
Author(s): | Patton, Aaron J.; Braun, Ross C.; Bearss, Ryan C.; Schortgen, Geoffrey P. |
Author Affiliation: | Patton, Braun, and Bearss: Dep. of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN; Schortgen: Wabash County Extension, Purdue Univ., Wabash, IN |
Title: | Herbicide tolerance in 11 grass species for minimal-to-no-mow golf course rough |
Section: | Agrosystems Other records with the "Agrosystems" Section |
Source: | Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2021, p. e20204 [1-13]. |
Publishing Information: | Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America |
# of Pages: | 13 |
Abstract/Contents: | "Research was conducted to determine the tolerance of 11 grass species used in minimal-to-no-mow turf areas to three postemergence herbicides applied at one- and twofold the maximum label rates in 2018 and 2019. Grasses were transplanted into field plots in West Lafayette, IN, in 2018 and 2019, allowed time to establish (~122 mo), and then either treated with one application of quinclorac, sethoxydim, and topramezone at two rates or not treated. All 11 grass species had acceptable tolerance (≤20% injury) to quinclorac applied at 0.845 kg acid equivalent (a.e.) ha-1. Quinclorac at 1.69 kg a.e. ha-1 produced moderate injury (≥21% injury) on only little bluestem [Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash.], prairie dropseed [Sporobolus heterolepis (A. Gray) A. Gray], and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra L. ssp. rubra Gaudin), which had ≤5% injury from all three herbicides, exhibited the greatest tolerance among grass species tested. With the exception of strong creeping red fescue, sethoxydim significantly injured all other grass species. Injury from topramezone varied among grass species and herbicide rates. Grasses tolerant (≤20% injury) to topramezone at both rates were big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus L.), indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutants (L.) Nash], strong creeping red fescue, and tall fescue [Festuca arundinacea Schreb.; syn. Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort., nom. cons.]. Tolerance among species was variable to quinclorac, sethoxydim, and topramezone, and thus turf managers should first identify desired grass species prior to herbicide application." |
Language: | English |
References: | 45 |
See Also: | See also related article "Herbicide tolerance of grass species used in minimal-to-no-mow golf course rough: Golf course superintendents who need to control weeds, especially with broadcast applications, in minimal-to-no-mow areas should first identify the species and their significance in the area prior to herbicide selection and application" Golf Course Management, 89(11) November 2021, p. 75-79, R=316424R=316424 |
Note: | Tables |
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-like – may be incomplete): | Patton, A. J., R. C. Braun, R. C. Bearss, and G. P. Schortgen. 2021. Herbicide tolerance in 11 grass species for minimal-to-no-mow golf course rough. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. 4(3):p. e20204 [1-13]. |
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: | http://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink/RECNO/327455 |
Choices for finding the above item: | |
DOI: 10.1002/agg2.20204 | |
Web URL(s) : | https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: HTML5 https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: JavaScript; HTML5 https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/agg2.20204 Last checked: 05/02/2023 Requires: PDF Reader |
Find from within TIC: | Digitally in TIC by record number. |
InterLibrary Loan: | Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback |