Skip to main content

Search form

Home
Turfgrass Information File (TGIF)

A cooperative project of the United States Golf Association and the Michigan State University Libraries' Turfgrass Information Center

United States Golf Association
Turfgrass Information Center
  • About TGIF
  • Search TGIF
    • Basic Search
    • Guided Search
    • Power Search
    • Rapid Results
    • Full Text Resources
    • Fastlink Generator
    • Thesaurus Search
  • Search Help
    • Getting Started Guide
    • Basic Search Help
    • Guided Search Help
    • Power Search Help
    • Rapid Results Help
    • Fastlinks Help
    • Record Display Help
  • Turfgrass Information Center (TIC)
  • The TIC Endowment
  • Feedback

Fastlink of full TGIF record #63258

The fastlink for this record is: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=63258
Full TGIF Record # 63258
Item 1 of 1
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Karcher, D. E.; Schabenberger, O.; Rieke, P. E.; Nikolai, T. A.; Rogers, J. N. III
Author Affiliation:Michigan State University
Title:Rating data: Reporting results in a statistically valid manner
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Meeting Info.:Salt Lake City, UT: October 31 - November 4, 1999
Source:1999 Annual Meeting Abstracts [ASA/CSSA/SSSA]. Vol. 91, 1999, p. 131.
# of Pages:1
Publishing Information:[Madison, WI]: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Quality; Measurement; Models; Turfgrass quality; Comparisons; Quality evaluation
Abstract/Contents:"Objectives of turfgrass research often require evaluation of turf quality. Turf quality is composed of several factors (color, density, uniformity, and texture) making quantification difficult. Evaluations typically involve assigning scores to turf plots using a scale of 1 to 9. Scores have traditionally been analyzed as continuous data, using ANOVA techniques to test hypotheses of treatment equality. These data are actually discrete (ordinal), and violate assumptions required for ANOVA. The proportional odds model (POM) accounts for the multivariate distribution of quality data. The POM estimates treatment parameters and predicts cumulative probability distributions (i.e. the probability of treatment #2 to receive a rating of "4"). The POM offers appropriate and powerful treatment comparisons and the results are independent of the category scores. Example data analyses using macros developed by the authors will be discussed."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Karcher, D. E., O. Schabenberger, P. E. Rieke, T. A. Nikolai, and J. N. III Rogers. 1999. Rating data: Reporting results in a statistically valid manner. Annu. Meet. Abstr. 91:p. 131.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=63258
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 63258.
Choices for finding the above item:
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 1 .A58
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)
  • Call Us: (517) 353-7209
  • Contact Information
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Accessibility
  • Call MSU: (517) 355-1855
  • Visit: msu.edu
  • MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer.
  • Notice of Nondescrimination
  • SPARTANS WILL.
  • © Michigan State University Board of Trustees