| |
| Web URL(s): | http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/0890-037X%282002%29016%5B0239%3AASOWSP%5D2.0.CO%3B2
Last checked: 03/16/2010
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Kim, Tae-Joon;
Neal, Joseph C.;
Ditomaso, Joseph M.;
Rossi, Frank S. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Kim: Research Scientist, Screening Research Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Yusong, South Korea; Neal: Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ditomaso: Weed Specialist, Department of Vegetable Crops, Weed Sciences Program, University of California, Davis, California; Rossi: Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York |
|---|
| Title: | A survey of weed scientists' perceptions on the significance of crabgrasses (Digitaria spp.) in the United States |
|---|
| Source: | Weed Technology. Vol. 16, No. 1, January 2002, p. 239-242. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 4 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Digitaria; Geographical distribution; Digitaria serotina; Digitaria longiflora; Digitaria sanguinalis; Digitaria ischaemum; Digitaria ciliaris; Questionnaire surveys; Perceptions
|
|---|
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "A survey was conducted to document the significance of crabgrass species among cropping systems and geographical regions in the continental United States. Surveys were mailed to 117 weed scientists, at least one in each state, including, where possible, extension weed scientists with responsibilities in each of the major agronomic and horticultural crops plus turfgrass systems. A 62% response rate was achieved. Large, smooth, and southern crabgrasses were considered at least occasionally important, with India and blanket crabgrasses considered rarely or not important. Smooth crabgrass and large crabgrass were considered to be important species in most of the latitudinal range, whereas southern crabgrass was considered to be important only in the southern states. Crabgrasses were considered to be more problematic in turf than in other cropping systems. From a regional perspective in turf, large crabgrass was the most important species in the Southeast, followed by southern crabgrass and smooth crabgrass. In the Northeast, smooth crabgrass was perceived as the more important species, but large crabgrass was more important in the north-central states." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 17 |
|---|
| Note: | Figures
Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Kim, T.-J., J. C. Neal, J. M. DiTomaso, and F. S. Rossi. 2002. A survey of weed scientists' perceptions on the significance of crabgrasses (Digitaria spp.) in the United States. Weed Technol. 16(1):p. 239-242. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=109760 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 109760. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1614/0890-037X%282002%29016%5B0239%3AASOWSP%5D2.0.CO%3B2
Last checked: 03/16/2010
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .W44 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
