Full TGIF Record # 109873
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2006-0210-02-TT
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0210-02-TT
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0210-02-TT
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Cisar, John L.; Reuter, Monika; Snyder, George H.; Fidanza, Michael A.
Author Affiliation:Cisar: Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Reuter and Snyder: Everglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Belle Glade, Florida; Fidanza: Berks Campus, Pennsylvania State University, Reading, Pennsylvania
Title:The use of non-saline reclaimed water for golf course irrigation in Florida
Section:Turfgrass science and industry trends
Other records with the "Turfgrass science and industry trends" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. February 10 2006, p. [1-5].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/3/1/2006-0210-02-TT
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Effluent water use; Irrigation; Irrigation water; Water conservation; Golf courses in the environment; Salinity; Questionnaire surveys; Perceptions
Abstract/Contents:"A survey of 150 golf course superintendents in central Florida was conducted in fall 1999 to determine the amount of reclaimed water use, level of satisfaction with reclaimed water, and benefits and problems with reclaimed water for irrigation. Eighty-five surveys were returned, with 46 of 85 (54%) superintendents using reclaimed water. A high percentage (91%) of those using reclaimed water were either satisfied or very satisfied with the water. The most frequently cited benefits were abundant supply, conservation of fresh water, and cost. A common concern was potential salinity or sodium in water and soil, even though the sampling area only included golf courses that use non-saline, reclaimed water. The most frequently observed problems associated with non-saline, reclaimed water included clogged irrigation heads, excessive rusting of equipment, and growth of algae on greens and holding ponds. Finally, 85% of the superintendents that were using reclaimed water would choose to continue its use."
Language:English
References:19
See Also:Other items relating to: Irrigation Water Quality

Other items relating to: Effluent Water Use
Note:Figures
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Cisar, J. L., G. H. Snyder, M. A. Fidanza, and M. Reuter. 2006. The use of non-saline reclaimed water for golf course irrigation in Florida. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. p. [1-5].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=109873
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 109873.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2006-0210-02-TT
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/3/1/2006-0210-02-TT
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/3/1/2006-0210-02-TT
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)