Full TGIF Record # 110203
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1614%2FWT-03-094R3
    Last checked: 03/30/2016
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Young, Steve L.
Author Affiliation:Staff Research Associate, University of California Hopland Research and Extension Center, Hopland, California
Title:Natural product herbicides for control of annual vegetation along roadsides
Section:Research
Other records with the "Research" Section
Source:Weed Technology. Vol. 18, No. 3, July-September 2004, p. 580-587.
Publishing Information:Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Herbicides; Biological weed control; Natural control; Annual weeds; Roadside plants; Acetic acid; Glyphosate; Costs; Herbicide evaluation
Abstract/Contents:"Natural product herbicides for vegetation control are being considered as alternatives to synthetic herbicides by many public agencies. Studies were conducted along roadsides at the Hopland Research and Extension Center (HREC) in 2001 and 2002 and on California State Route 29 (SR29) in 2002 to evaluate acetic acid, pine oil, and plant essentials compared with glysophate for control of herbaceous vegetation. In 2001, annual grass control after a single application of pine oil at HREC was 40% or less effective, whereas acetic acid was at least 79% effective. A second application of pine oil or acetic oil did not control regrowth or new plants. In 2002, plant essentials was the most effective (>80%) natural product at HREC for control of annual grasses, except slender oat. Pine oil often provided similar control of slender oat as plant essentials (71 and 69%, respectively). At SR29, five applications of acetic oil provided 83% or better control of slender oat, hare barley, medusahead, and broadleaf filaree. Plant essentials and pine oil controlled hairy vetch, broadleaf filaree, and hare barley at least 83%, but yellow starthistle, soft chess, buckhorn plantain, and medusahead control never exceeded 85%. Glyphosate controlled all vegetation in these experiments with one or two applications. The cost of one or more applications of the natural products was greater than 10 times the cost of using one or two applications of glyphosate. Natural products were neither efficaciously nor economically comparable with glyphosate for control of annual roadside vegetation."
Language:English
References:11
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Young, S. L. 2004. Natural product herbicides for control of annual vegetation along roadsides. Weed Technol. 18(3):p. 580-587.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=110203
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 110203.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1614%2FWT-03-094R3
    Last checked: 03/30/2016
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .W44
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)