Full TGIF Record # 112051
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://usgatero.msu.edu/v05/n13.pdf
    Last checked: 06/26/2006
    Requires: PDF Reader
https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/gcman/article/2007jan154.pdf
    Last checked: 09/30/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):St. John, Rodney; Christians, Nick
Author Affiliation:St. John: Assistant Professor and Turfgrass Extension Specialist, Horticulture and Forestry Department, Kansas State University, Olathe, Kansas; Christians: Professor, Turfgrass Management, Department of Horticulture, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Title:Soil testing methods for sand-based putting greens
Source:USGA Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online. Vol. 5, No. 13, July 1 2006, p. [1-5].
# of Pages:7
Publishing Information:Far Hills, NJ: United States Golf Association, Green Section
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Golf greens; Sand-based golf greens; Root zone; Cation exchange capacity; Calcium carbonate; Soil testing; Cations; Soil test values; Soil chemistry
Abstract/Contents:"Sand-based putting greens have limited nutrient holding capacity. Therefore, understanding the nutritional status of the root-zone media is essential to proper turfgrass management. This research is focused on basic cation (calcium, magnesium, potassium, etc.) nutrition of sand-based greens. Specifically, we are looking at different soil testing techniques for measuring exchangeable basic cations and cation exchange capacity (CEC). This study's findings were: The presence of CaCO3 can greatly affect the results of various soil testing techniques. Of the procedures examined in this research, the NH4OAc pH 8.1 appears to be the best extractant for measuring exchangeable cations from calcareous sand samples. The NH4OAc pH 8.1 technique had the lowest rates of dissolution of CaCO3, but it still dissolved appreciable quantities of CaCO3. Therefore, calculating an ECEC by summation of exchangeable cations measured from any of the procedures evaluated in this research, including NH4OAc pH 8.1, is not advised for samples from calcareous sands and a double extraction technique should be used when extremely accurate tests are needed."
Language:English
References:6
See Also:Other Reports from this USGA research project: 2003-02-243
Note:Partial reprint appears in Alabama Green, Vol. 2 Summer 2006, p. 30
Partial reprint appears in The Reporter [Rocky Mountain GCSA], 41(6) September 2006, p. 3, 6
Partial reprint appears in Cactus Clippings, September/October 2006, p. 29
Reprint appears in USGA Green Section Record, 44(6) November/December 2006, p. 15-18
Reprint appears in Golf Course Management, Vol. 75, No. 1, January 2007, page 154-156
Partial reprint appears in The Perfect Lie, 31(1) March 2007, p. 27
Partial reprint appears in Turfgrass Times [Illinois], 11(4) August/September 2008, p. 19
Summary appears as abstract
Pictures, color
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
St. John, R., and N. Christians. 2006. Soil testing methods for sand-based putting greens. USGA Turfgrass Environ. Res. Online. 5(13):p. [1-5].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=112051
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 112051.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://usgatero.msu.edu/v05/n13.pdf
    Last checked: 06/26/2006
    Requires: PDF Reader
https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/gcman/article/2007jan154.pdf
    Last checked: 09/30/2008
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 433 .A1 A65 [online]
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)