Full TGIF Record # 112569
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_2006.pdf#page=97
    Last checked: 07/22/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Hixson, A. C.; Gannon, T. W.; Yelverton, F. H.
Author Affiliation:North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Title:Efficacy of plant growth regulators on tall fescue applied using application placement equipment
Section:Turfgrass and plant regulators
Other records with the "Turfgrass and plant regulators" Section
Meeting Info.:Providence, RI: January 3-6, 2006
Source:Proceedings: NortheasternWeed Science Society. Vol. 60, 2006, p. 92.
Publishing Information:Ithaca, NY: Northeastern Weed Science Society
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Growth regulators; Festuca arundinacea; Foliar targeted spraying; Herbicide application; Seedhead inhibition; Application methods; Mowers; Equipment
Abstract/Contents:"Field research was conducted to evaluate plant growth regulator (PGR) applications through application placement technologies in which pesticides are placed directly onto cut surfaces of plants during a mowing operation. Specially designed mowers equipped with a fluid application system allow for low-volume PGR application from the mower blades allowing mowing and pesticide applications to be completed in a single pass. A wet-blade, wick-type, and broadcast sprayer were used to apply imazapic at three rates (8.8, 35.1, and 52.6 g ai/ha), and melfluidide + chlorsulfuron tank mix at 6.6 + 140.2 g ai/ha. Studies were conducted on tall fescue roadsides during a two-year period (2003 and 2004). Application placement equipment did not improve PGR efficacy when compared to a foliar broadcast spray. Tall fescue was slightly injured and discolored by all treatments , but recovered by one month after treatment. Imazapic at 52.6 g ai/ha suppressed plant growth for three months after treatment compared to the nontreated (17cm of growth) when applied with the wick application and broadcast sprayer (6.8 and 2.5 cm respectively). When compared with nonmowed treatments, all treatments applied with the wet-blade failed to cause a reduction in tall fescue growth. In 2003, seedheads were completely suppressed by all treatments throughout the study. Seedheads were not completely suppressed in 2004, ranging from 76 to 100% reduction of seedheads when compared to the nontreated with the lowest rate of imazapic applied with the wet-blade machine providing the lowest seedhead control."
Language:English
References:0
See Also:Other items relating to: P G Rs 1997-2006

Other items relating to: Foliar Feeding & Uptake
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hixson, A. C., T. W. Gannon, and F. H. Yelverton. 2006. Efficacy of plant growth regulators on tall fescue applied using application placement equipment. Proc. Annu. Meet. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:p. 92.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=112569
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 112569.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_2006.pdf#page=97
    Last checked: 07/22/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: SB 610 .N62 v. 60
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by file name: newss2006
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)