Full TGIF Record # 112577
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1081/CSS-120024054
Web URL(s):http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/CSS-120024054#.VCsV-vldXh4
    Last checked: 09/30/2014
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/CSS-120024054
    Last checked: 09/30/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Santana, Rafael Ramos; Martínez, Gustavo; Macchiavelli, Raúl; Rodríguez, José E.; Guzmán, José L.
Author Affiliation:Santana and Rodríguez: Agronomy and Soils Department, University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, Corozal, Puerto Rico; Martínez and Guzmán: Agronomy and Soils Department, University of Puerto Rico, Agricultural Experiment Station, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico; Macchiavelli: Agronomy and Soils Department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
Title:Potential of trees, grasses, and turf legumes for restoring eroded soils
Source:Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. Vol. 34, No. 15/16, September 2003, p. 2149-2162.
Publishing Information:New York, NY: Marcel Dekker
# of Pages:14
Related Web URL:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/CSS-120024054#.VCsWR_ldXh4
    Last checked: 09/30/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Erosion control; Erosion; Grasses; Legumes; Trees; Comparisons; Carbon; Ground cover
Abstract/Contents:"The performance and development potential of seven trees, two grasses and five turf legumes were evaluated in three highly eroded landscapes of Puerto Rico. Species development during the first year of establishment was adequate at the Corozal site, intermediate in Vega Baja and poor at the Orocovis location. Tree species Albicia procera and Leucaena leucocephala K 636 grew particularly well at Corozal and Vega Baja. At the Corozal site, grasses and turf legumes were significantly better for reducing soil erosion than trees and bare ground. Brachiaria decumbens did not allow sediment losses during a highly rainy period at this locale; it was significantly (P < 0.01) superior to all tree species, one cover legume and bare ground. Soil dissolved organic carbon (SDOC) estimates were significantly (P < 0.01) higher for ground cover species than for tree species and bare ground. Soil chemical composition of all eroded soil sites under consideration did not explain the changes in performance and development of the evaluated germplasm."
Language:English
References:23
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Santana, R. R., G. Martínez, R. Macchiavelli, J. E. Rodríguez, and J. L. Guzmán. 2003. Potential of trees, grasses, and turf legumes for restoring eroded soils. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 34(15/16):p. 2149-2162.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=112577
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 112577.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120024054
Web URL(s):
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/CSS-120024054#.VCsV-vldXh4
    Last checked: 09/30/2014
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1081/CSS-120024054
    Last checked: 09/30/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 590 .C54
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)