| |
Web URL(s): | https://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/?file=/1940s/1940/4011126.pdf#page=3 Last checked: 01/24/2017 Requires: PDF Reader Notes: Item is within a single large file |
Publication Type:
| Professional |
Content Type: | Q & A |
Corporate Author(s): | USGA Green Section |
Title: | Commercial fertilizer vs. manure for topdressing turf |
Section: | Our letter box Other records with the "Our letter box" Section
|
Source: | Turf Culture [II]. Vol. 2, No. 2, November 1940, p. 128. |
Publishing Information: | Washington, DC: United States Golf Association, Green Section |
# of Pages: | 1 |
Question: | "We have had quite a bit of discussion about whether it is better to use sewage sludge or cow or horse manure when top-dressing the fairways on our course. We have no means of sterilizing the maure and must spread it by hand. We should be grateful for any advice you can give us." |
Source of Question: | Florida |
Answer/Response: | "All our experimental work has shown that for fairway fertilizing it is better to use sewage sludge or some commercial fertilizers than cow or horse manure as top-dressing." |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Fertilizer recommendations; Golf fairway maintenance; Manures; Recommendations; Sewage sludge; Topdressing
|
Language: | English |
References: | 0 |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): USGA Green Section. 1940. Commercial fertilizer vs. manure for topdressing turf. Turf Culture [II]. 2(2):p. 128. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=120190 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 120190. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): https://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/?file=/1940s/1940/4011126.pdf#page=3 Last checked: 01/24/2017 Requires: PDF Reader Notes: Item is within a single large file |
| MSU catalog number: SB 433.25 .C66 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |