| |
Web URL(s): | https://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/?file=/1920s/1929/2911206.pdf#page=1 Last checked: 01/25/2017 Requires: PDF Reader |
Publication Type:
| Professional |
Content Type: | Q & A |
Corporate Author(s): | USGA Green Section |
Title: | Necessity for proper balance in complete fertilizers |
Section: | Questions and answers Other records with the "Questions and answers" Section
|
Source: | The Bulletin of the United States Golf Association Green Section. Vol. 9, No. 11, November 1929, p. 206-207. |
Publishing Information: | Washington, DC: USGA Green Section |
# of Pages: | 2 |
Question: | "We are offered a commercial fertilizer analyzing 15-30-15 at $90 a ton delivered. What is its value in comparison with cottonseed meal at $45.50 a ton delivered?" |
Source of Question: | Virginia |
Answer/Response: | "We compare fertilizers for turf work chiefly on the basis of the nitrogen content since this is the element which is most costly and of most value for growing fine turf. Cottonseed meal usually analyzes 6-3-2. If 6 per cent of nitrogen, such as contained in the cottonseed meal, costs $45.50 a ton, 15 per cent, as contained in the commercial fertilizer you mention, would be worth $113.75 a ton. Therefore on the nitrogen basis alone the commercial fertilizer at $90 a ton would be an economy. We do not, however, recommend a fertilizer analyzing 15-30-15 for regular use on putting greens or fairways, since it is too high in phosphorus (30 per cent) and potash (15 per cent). One or two applications of such a fertilizer to greens or fairways would probably be beneficial, but if used constantly the phosphorus and potash content of the soil might be increased to such an extent as to cause trouble from clover and weeds. Cottonseed meal, pulverized poultry manure, and activated sludge, each of which analyzes about 6-3-2, are in our opinion better balanced for fine turf purposes than the commercial fertilizer to which you have referred. These three 6-3-2 fertilizers possess further advantage in that, being organic fertilizers, they decompose more slowly and thus have a more lasting effect than the inorganic fertilizers. "\Vhere quick results are, however, desired, the inorganic fertilizers are to be preferred. Sulphate ammonia at a cost of about $60 a ton contains 20 per cent nitrogen. Detailed information on determining the value of commercial fertilizers is contained in the article on page 113 of the Bulletin for June, 1928." |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Cost efficiency; Fertilizer costs; Fertilizer evaluation; NPK fertilizers; Nutritional value; Recommendations
|
Language: | English |
References: | 0 |
See Also: | See also related article "The fertilizer and the bag" The Bulletin of the United States Golf Association Green Section, 8(6) June 1928, p. 113-116 R=51130 R=51130 |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): USGA Green Section. 1929. Necessity for proper balance in complete fertilizers. Bull. U.S. Golf Assoc. Green Sec. 9(11):p. 206-207. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=120949 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 120949. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| Web URL(s): https://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/?file=/1920s/1929/2911206.pdf#page=1 Last checked: 01/25/2017 Requires: PDF Reader |
| MSU catalog number: SB 433.15 .B85 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |