Full TGIF Record # 129890
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://img.kisti.re.kr/soc_img/society//tsk/JDHHBF/1997/v11n2/JDHHBF_1997_v11n2_97.pdf
    Last checked: 01/28/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Joo, Young Kyoo; Lee, Jae-Pil; Christians, Nick E.
Author Affiliation:Joo: Department of Biological Resources and Technology, Yonsei University; Lee: Animal Resources Research Center, Kon-Kuk University; Christians: Department of Horticulture, Iowa State University
Title:Growth response of bentgrass to polymer coated urea
Source:Korean Journal of Turfgrass Science. Vol. 11, No. 2, 1997, p. 97-104[248-255].
Publishing Information:Korea: Turfgrass Society of Korea
# of Pages:8
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Growth factors; Agrostis stolonifera; Polymer-coated urea; Urea; Comparisons; Quality evaluation; Clipping weight; Nitrogen fertilization; Visual evaluation; Application rates; Application timing
Cultivar Names:Penneagle
Abstract/Contents:"The objective of this study was to observe the differences in growth of creeping bentgrass turf to 'polymer coated urea fertilizer' and 'uncoated urea fertilizer', and to analyze durability of fertilizer effect with the 'polymer coated urea'. The experiment was initiated on June 3, 1996, at the Iowa State University Horticulture Research Station, north of Ames, Iowa. The experiment was conducted on an area of 'Penneagle' Creeping bentgrass(Agrostis palustris) maintained at fairway mowing height(1.3cm). The study was repeated at the same arrangement beginning on July 25, 1996. Visual quality data, clipping fresh and dry weight, and nitrogen(N) content in the clippings were taken weekly. Quality of the turf increased with increasing N rate. While quality ratings were higher for turf receiving polymer coated urea than for turf receiving uncoated urea at several times following treatment, but not significant. Fresh and dry clipping weights were quite variable during the trial. Visual quality rating and clipping yields improved with increasing rates of N but these differences were not statically significant between polymer coated and uncoated urea treatment. The durability of fertilizer efficiency in polymer coated urea was not last longer compare with uncoated urea from two weeks after treatment. Higher rates of N application increased the concentration of N in tissue but no significant differences between turf plots receiving polymer coated and uncoated urea."
Language:English
References:14
Note:Abstract appears in English
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Joo, Y. K., J.-P. Lee, and N. E. Christians. 1997. Growth response of bentgrass to polymer coated urea. (In English, with English abstract.) Korean Journal of Turfgrass Science. 11(2):p. 97-104[248-255].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=129890
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 129890.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://img.kisti.re.kr/soc_img/society//tsk/JDHHBF/1997/v11n2/JDHHBF_1997_v11n2_97.pdf
    Last checked: 01/28/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b5472572a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)