Full TGIF Record # 134084
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://img.kisti.re.kr/soc_img/society//tsk/JDHHBF/2006/v20n2/JDHHBF_2006_v20n2_203.pdf
    Last checked: 01/28/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Lee, Jae-Pil; Park, Hyun-Chul; Kim, Doo-Hwan
Author Affiliation:Lee: Department of Golf Course and Turfgrass, Graduate School of Agriculture and Science; Park: Department of Horticultural Science; Kim: Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
Title:Comparison of play ability of soccer fields with natural turfgrass, artificial turf and bare ground
Source:Korean Journal of Turfgrass Science. Vol. 20, No. 2, 2006, p. 203-211.
Publishing Information:Korea: Turfgrass Society of Korea
# of Pages:9
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Playability; Artificial turf; Natural versus artificial turf; Soccer fields; Ball roll measurement; Ball rebound resilience; Comparisons; Zoysia; Maintenance intensity
Abstract/Contents:"This study was initiated to investigate the difference of playing ability among soccer fields established with natural turfgrass, artificial turf and bare ground. The soccer fields with natural turfgrasses were established with cool-season grass(Kentucky bluegrass 80%+Perennial ryegrass 20%) and zoysiagrass. The artificial turf field was constructed with Konigreen DV5000ā„¢. Bare ground was sandy soil. Data such as ball rolling distance and vertical ball rebound were collected at the Sports Science Town of Konkuk University from 2005 to 2006. A ball in the study was Hummel Air Vision #1, certified by KFA(Korea Football Association) in ball pressure of 1.0lb. Ball rolling distance was the longest on bare ground(13.6m), followed by artificial grass(11.4m), cool-season grass(7.8m) and zoysiagrass(4.7m). It decreased with lower frequency in use, stronger rigidity and higher density of turfgrass. Vertical ball rebound was the highest on bare ground(1.0m), followed by artificial grass(0.9m), cool-season grass(0.6m) and zoysiagrass(0.4m). It was lower under conditions of low use frequency, strong rigidity, and high density. Both ball rolling distance and vertical ball rebound were not greatly affected by cool-season grass maintained with high intensity of culture by years after establishment. However, zoysiagrass field under low intensity of culture showed longer in ball rolling distance and higher in vertical ball rebound with time after establishment."
Language:Korean
References:17
See Also:Other items relating to: Artificial vs. Natural Turf Surfaces
Note:Abstract appears in English
Pictures, b/w
Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Lee, J.-P., H.-C. Park, and D.-H. Kim. 2006. Comparison of play ability of soccer fields with natural turfgrass, artificial turf and bare ground. (In Korean, with English abstract.) Korean Journal of Turfgrass Science. 20(2):p. 203-211.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=134084
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 134084.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://img.kisti.re.kr/soc_img/society//tsk/JDHHBF/2006/v20n2/JDHHBF_2006_v20n2_203.pdf
    Last checked: 01/28/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b5472572a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)