Full TGIF Record # 135766
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2008-0520-02-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/5/1/2008-0520-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/5/1/2008-0520-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Brosnan, J. T.; McNitt, A. S.
Author Affiliation:Brosnan: Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii; McNitt: Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Title:Synthetic versus natural turfgrass
Article Series:Surface conditions of highly maintained baseball fields in the northeastern United State, part 2
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 5, No. 1, December 2008, p. [1-8].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:8
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/5/1/2008-0520-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Surface speed; Baseball fields; Natural versus Artificial turf; Surface hardness; Skinned areas; Sports turf safety
Abstract/Contents:"Pace is a measure of the relative velocity at which a ball travels after impacting a playing surface. Information about the pace of balls impacting highly maintained natural and synthetic turf baseball field surfaces is minimal. A survey was conducted in 2005 to document the pace and surface hardness of baseball field playing surfaces in the northeastern United States. Nine natural turfgrass baseball fields and five synthetic turf fields were evaluated. Surface pace and surface hardness values of these highly maintained fields differed little between synthetic and natural turfgrass. Surface pace measurements on synthetic turf surfaces were slightly less variable from field to field than those measured on natural turfgrass surfaces. Much greater differences in surface pace and hardness were detected between the non-turfed basepaths, reported in Part 1 of the project, compared to either natural or synthetic turf. Within the parameters of this study, the natural turfgrass surfaces and the infilled synthetic turf surfaces evaluated differed little in surface pace or surface hardness."
Language:English
References:13
See Also:See also part 1 "Non-turfed basepaths" Applied Turfgrass Science, 19 May 2008, p. [1-8], R=135763. R=135763
See Also:Other items relating to: Artificial vs. Natural Turf Surfaces
Note:"Published May 19 2008"
Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Brosnan, J. T., and A. S. McNitt. 2008. Synthetic versus natural turfgrass. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 5(1):p. [1-8].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=135766
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 135766.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2008-0520-02-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/5/1/2008-0520-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/5/1/2008-0520-02-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)