Full TGIF Record # 138844
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/3/3/JEQ0030030214
    Last checked: 11/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Kilmer, V. J.; Gilliam, J. W.; Lutz, J. F.; Joyce, R. T.; Eklund, C. D.
Author Affiliation:Kilmer: Chief, Soils and Fertilizer Research Branch, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama; Joyce and Eklund: Hydrologists, Hydraulic Data Branch, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee; Gilliam: Associate Professor; Lutz: Professor Emeritus, Soil Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Title:Nutrient losses from fertilized grassed watersheds in Western North Carolina
Section:Technical reports
Other records with the "Technical reports" Section
Source:Journal of Environmental Quality. Vol. 3, No. 3, July-September 1974, p. 214-219.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:6
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Surface runoff; Nutrient transport; Drainage; Nitrogen; Fertilizers; Precipitation; Comparisons; Watersheds; Phosphorus; Potassium; Sulfur; Fertilization rates; Leaching
Geographic Terms:North Carolina
Abstract/Contents:"The transport of plant nutrients in drainage waters from two steeply sloping, differentially fertilized, grassed watersheds located in western North Carolina was determined over a 4-year period. Watershed No. 1 has a drainage area of 1.89 ha, No. 2, 1.48 ha. The dominant slopes on both watersheds are 35 to 40%. During this period, watershed No. 1 received a total of 112-48-24 kg N-P-K/ha; watershed No. 2 received 448-192-24 kg N-P-K/ha. Average annual measured N losses were 3.28 and 12.08 kg/ha for watershed No. 1 and watershed No. 2, respectively; NO3-N comprised 70% and 85% of the total N lost in discharge waters from the two watersheds. Total N lost over the 4-year period from each watershed was 6 to 10% of the fertilizer N applied. Annual P losses were negligible, amounting to 0.15 kg/ha from watershed No. 1 and 0.27 kg/ha from watershed No. 2. Measured K losses averaged 3.99 and 5.83 kg/ha annually; S losses were 1.92 and 2.54 kg/ha from watershed No. 1 and watershed No. 2, respectively. Additional nutrient losses likely occurred because of deep seepage and an estimate of these losses was made. Losses of all nutrients were highest during the winter and spring months. Concentrations of nutrients in discharge waters from watershed No. 2 were consistently higher compared with watershed No. 1. However, NO3-N concentrations exceeded 10 ppm on watershed No. 2 only once during the 4-year period. The authors conclude from this study that steeply sloping pastures, judiciously fertilized, are not an important source of nutrients occurring in surface and ground waters."
Language:English
References:29
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Kilmer, V. J., J. W. Gilliam, J. F. Lutz, R. T. Joyce, and C. D. Eklund. 1974. Nutrient losses from fertilized grassed watersheds in Western North Carolina. J. Environ. Qual. 3(3):p. 214-219.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=138844
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 138844.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/3/3/JEQ0030030214
    Last checked: 11/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Sponsorship:
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2225072a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)