Full TGIF Record # 141135
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2008-1006-01-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/5/1/2008-1006-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/5/1/2008-1006-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Van Dyke, Adam; Johnson, Paul G.; Grossl, Paul R.
Author Affiliation:Department of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Title:Humic substances effect on moisture retention and phosphorus uptake in intermountain west putting greens
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 5, No. 1, December 2008, p. [1-9].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:9
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/5/1/2008-1006-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Humic substances; Soil water retention; Soil amendments; Climatic factors; Soil pH; Phosphorus uptake; Golf greens; Organic acids; Chlorophyll content; Agrostis stolonifera; Humic acids
Geographic Terms:Utah
Abstract/Contents:"Humic substances are often used as an amendment in putting greens to improve turf health, but little is known regarding their effects on soil moisture retention. Commercial humic substances products and pure organic acids were applied to three golf course putting greens in Utah in 2006 and the Utah State University research putting green in 2006 and 2007. These treatments were evaluated for effects on soil volumetric water content, phosphorus uptake, and chlorophyll content of creeping bentrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.). Three irrigation levels - 80%, 70%, and 60% - of reference evapotransiration (ET0) were imposed on the turf at the research putting green. Humic substances did not increase moisture retention in putting green soils as pure humic acid significantly decreased soil volumetric water content compared to the control. Both humic acid and fulvic acid-treated plots had lower soil moisture content readings that the control at a depth of 10 to 15 cm during the growing season. Uptake of P by creeping bentgrass was significantly decreased with the application of humic acid, and no differences were observed for chlorophyll content of the turf with any humic substance threatment. While they may provide other benefits, humic substances may not provide superintendents with benefits of reducing water or P fertilizer on putting greens."
Language:English
References:20
See Also:See also related article "Effects of humic acids on greens: Humic acids have been used to promote nutrient uptake and water retention in greens, but are they effective?" Golf Course Management, 77(11) November 2009, p. 82-84, 86, 88, 90, R=157351. R=157351
Note:"Published October 6 2008"
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Van Dyke, A., P. G. Johnson, and P. R. Grossl. 2008. Humic substances effect on moisture retention and phosphorus uptake in intermountain west putting greens. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 5(1):p. [1-9].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=141135
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 141135.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2008-1006-01-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/5/1/2008-1006-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/5/1/2008-1006-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)