Full TGIF Record # 148718
Item 1 of 1
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Hagel, Brent E.; Fick, Gordon H.; Meeuwisse, Willem H.
Author Affiliation:Hagel: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Fick: Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine; Meeuwisse: University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Title:Injury risk in men's Canada West University football
Source:American Journal of Epidemiology. Vol. 157, No. 9, May 2003, p. 825-833.
Publishing Information:Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health
# of Pages:9
Related Web URL:https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/157/9/825/97439/Injury-Risk-in-Men-s-Canada-West-University
    Last checked: 02/10/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Athletic injury incidence; Football; Natural versus artificial turf; Sports turf safety
Abstract/Contents:"Injury and participation information was collected over 5 years (1993-1997) on varsity men's football players in the Canada West Universities Athletic Association. The locations of acute time-loss injuries or neurologic injures were coded as head and neck, upper extremity (shoulder to hand), or lower extremity (hip to foot). Poisson regression-based generalized estimating equations were used to estimate rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Injury rates were higher during games as compared with practice periods (for the head and neck, rate ratio (RR)=9.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.50, 12.67); for upper extremities, RR=5.76 (95% CI: 4.46, 7.45); and for lower extremities, RR=7.06 (95% CI: 6.03, 8.25)). In the dry-field game situations, head and neck injury rates were 1.59 times higher on artificial turf than on natural grass (95% CI: 1.04, 2.42). Lower extremity agame injury rates were higher on artificial turn than on natural grass under both dry (RR=1.83, 95% CI:1.35, 2.48) and wet (RR=2.31, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.52) field conditions. Injury rates increased with every additional year of participation. Past injury increased the rate of subsequent injury. The effects of an artificial field surface may be related to infrequent use. Risk factors for injury included participation in a game, playing on artificial turf, being a veteran player, and having a past injury."
Language:English
References:31
Note:Partial reprint appears in Sports Turf Manager, Winter 2003, p. 8, with variant title "Study looks at injuries with artificial turfgrass: types and causes of injurues in Canadian football players"
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Hagel, B. E., G. H. Fick, and W. H. Meeuwisse. 2003. Injury risk in men's Canada West University football. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157(9):p. 825-833.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=148718
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 148718.
Choices for finding the above item:
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: RA 421 .A5
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)