Full TGIF Record # 149183
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/PHYTO.2009.99.6.S1
Web URL(s):http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PHYTO.2009.99.6.S1#page=95
    Last checked: 06/12/2009
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Nyczepir, A. P.
Author Affiliation:United States Department of Agriculture Agrictultural Research Center, Byron, Georgia
Title:Host susceptibility of tall fescue grass to Meloidogyne spp. and Mesocriconema xenoplax
Section:Abstracts submitted for presentation at the 2009 APS annual meeting
Other records with the "Abstracts submitted for presentation at the 2009 APS annual meeting" Section
Meeting Info.:Portland, Oregon: August 1-5, 2009
Source:Phytopathology. Vol. 99, No. 6, June Supplement 2009, p. S95.
Publishing Information:St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Chemical control; Festuca arundinacea; Host plant resistance; Meloidogyne; Mesocriconema xenoplax; Nematicides; Nematoda; Susceptibility
Abstract/Contents:"Preplant fumigant nematicides have traditionally been used to control Meloidogyne spp. and Mesocriconema xenoplax in peach in the Southeast. In recent years growers have faced economic hardships, making it difficult to afford costs associated with these chemicals. Finding an alternative to control these nematodes is warranted. Greenhouse trials were conducted to evaluate the susceptibility of E+ and E- tall fescue grass to M. incognita and M. xenoplax. Fescue lines evaluated included, i) Jesup EI (E+, wild-type endophyte present), ii) Jesup EF (E-, no endophyte present), iii) Max-Q (E+, but non-ergot producing endophyte), and iv) GA-5 (E+). Peach was included as the control. Nematode reproduction criteria were used in evaluating fescue susceptibility. Peach supported greater (P < 0.05) reproduction of M. incognita and M. xenoplax than all fescue lines. Differences in reproduction were not detected among the fescue lines for either nematode. All fescue lines were either poor or nonhosts for M. incognita and the endophyte does not appear to effect nematode reproduction. In contrast, M. xenoplax reproduction was detected in the fescue lines. An initial test evaluating Max-Q for susceptibility to M. hapla indicated that Max-Q did not support M. hapla reproduction compared to a tomato control. These results provide useful insights into the potential use of tall fescue grass as a preplant alternative to chemical control of Meloidogyne spp."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"2009 APS Annual Meeting"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Nyczepir, A. P. 2009. Host susceptibility of tall fescue grass to Meloidogyne spp. and Mesocriconema xenoplax. Phytopathology. 99(6):p. S95.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=149183
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 149183.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2009.99.6.S1
Web URL(s):
http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PHYTO.2009.99.6.S1#page=95
    Last checked: 06/12/2009
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2219736a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by file name: phytp2009junpres
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)