Full TGIF Record # 149509
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/14871a.pdf
    Last checked: 02/06/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Kopec, D. M.; Gilbert, J.; Pessarakli, M.; Nolan, Steven
Author Affiliation:Kopec: Extension Specialist, Turfgrass Management; Gilbert: Research Specialist Senior, Turfgrass; Pessarakli: Research Associate Professor, Turfgrass Science; Nolan: Student Research Assistant, Turfgrass, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona
Title:Foliar applications of hydro-gro and UAN 32 on overseeded berumudagrass greens turf
Section:Turfgrass fertility
Other records with the "Turfgrass fertility" Section
Source:2009 Turfgrass, Landscape and Urban IPM Research Summary [Arizona]. February 2009, p. 1-25.
# of Pages:25
Publishing Information:Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona College of Agriculture & Life Sciences
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Application timing; Color evaluation; Cynodon; Fertilizer efficacy; Fertilizer evaluation; Turfgrass quality
Trade Names:Hydro-Gro; UAN 32
Abstract/Contents:"Hydro-Gro ( 10-0-0) and UAN 32 (32-0-0) were applied once every 10, 15 or 30 days on a bermudagrass green overseeded with Poa trivialis at the rate of 9.0 lbs. PLS/M in mid October, 2007. Regardless of application frequency, each product was applied to achieve a 020. lb./N/1000 ft2 nitrogen rate. Hydro-Gro produced a darker green turf than did the UAN, when averaged over all application timings. Enhanced turfgrass color was more consistent when Hydro-Gro was applied every 15 days (2x/monthly) compared to the 10 and 30 day application timings of this product. For the UAN source, no single application timing scheme produced a consistently darker Poa trivialis turf compared to any other application timing for the same product. Turfgrass quality was slightly greater on average for Hydro-Gro than that of the UAN treatments, although each source produced a better quality turf at one time or another within the two month application / evaluation period (Nov 15, 2007 to Jan 3, 2008). The addition of supplemental P and K did not enhance visual color or quality for either of these N source products from November to early January. Neither N source, their application timings, or the addition of supplemental P and K had any affect on turfgrass density, texture or overall uniformity."
Language:English
References:0
Note:"Published February 2009"
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Kopec, D. M., J. Gilbert, M. Pessarakli, and S. Nolan. 2009. Foliar applications of hydro-gro and UAN 32 on overseeded berumudagrass greens turf. Turfgrass Landscape Urban IPM Res. Summ. p. 1-25.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=149509
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 149509.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/14871a.pdf
    Last checked: 02/06/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b4009236a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)