Full TGIF Record # 151035
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2009jou1067.pdf
    Last checked: 10/18/2011
    Requires: PDF Reader
Access Restriction:Certain MSU-hosted archive URLs may be restricted to legacy database members.
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Dest, W. M.; Ebdon, J. S.; Guillard, K.
Author Affiliation:Dest and Guillard: Department of Plant Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut; Ebdon: Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
Title:Differentiating between the influence of wear and soil compaction and their interaction of turfgrass stress
Section:Soil physics and rootzone construction
Other records with the "Soil physics and rootzone construction" Section
Meeting Info.:Santiago, Chile: July 26-30 2009
Source:International Turfgrass Society Research Journal. Vol. 11, No. Part 2, 2009, p. 1067-1083.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: International Turfgrass Society
# of Pages:17
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Compaction; Hydraulic conductivity; Infiltration rate; Lolium perenne; Physical properties of soil; Poa pratensis; Stress factors; Traffic; Traffic simulators; Wear
Abstract/Contents:"Traffic is broken down into wear and soil compaction but few studies directly compare between these two confounding factors and their interactive effects on soil and plant response. The objective of this study was to differentiate between the effects of wear and compaction on turfgrass performance and soil physical and surface properties. Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) were planted in the fall of 2004 on both sand and silt loam [coarse silty mixed, non acid, mesic Typic Udifluvents] soils. Both soils were compacted to a uniform hardness before planting. Treatments included a compaction and non-compaction treatment with a wear and non-wear treatment. Wear was applied with a steel brush set into a frame so no compaction was imposed. Compaction significantly inhibited establishment compared to non-compaction. Compaction treatments increased perennial ryegrass content in the stand over non-compaction. The sand promoted greater Kentucky bluegrass and thatch tendency. Rooting in response to compaction increased in the 0 to 7.5 cm zone and decreased in the 7.5 to 15 cm soil depth when compared to non-compaction. Wear main effects accounted for 90% of the total variation in wear injury with soil and compaction main effects and interaction components accounting for the balance. Deep rooting decreased with greater soil penetration resistance. Soil and wear main effects were the principal factors affecting turfgrass quality. Wear treatment did not affect soil physical properties while compaction altered aeration porosity, percent of maximum dry density, and saturated hydraulic conductivity."
Language:English
References:42
Note:Reprint appears in 2009 Annual Turfgrass Research Report [Connecticut], 2010, p. 94
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Dest, W. M., J. S. Ebdon, and K. Guillard. 2009. Differentiating between the influence of wear and soil compaction and their interaction of turfgrass stress. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 11(Part 2):p. 1067-1083.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=151035
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 151035.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2009jou1067.pdf
    Last checked: 10/18/2011
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2548899
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)