| |
| Web URL(s): | https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/49/3/1071
Last checked: 11/16/2016
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/49/3/1071
Last checked: 11/16/2016
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Fu, Jinmin;
Dernoeden, Peter H. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Fu: Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan City, Hubei, China; Dernoeden: Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland |
|---|
| Title: | Creeping bentgrass putting green turf responses to two irrigation practices: Quality, chlorophyll, canopy temperature, and thatch-mat |
|---|
| Section: | Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | Crop Science. Vol. 49, No. 3, May/June 2009, p. 1071-1078. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 8 |
|---|
| Related Web URL: | https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/abstracts/49/3/1071
Last checked: 11/16/2016
Notes: Abstract only |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Canopy temperature; Chlorophyll; Evapotranspiration; Golf greens; Irrigation practices; Irrigation rates; Quality evaluation; Thatch accumulation
|
|---|
| Cultivar Names: | Providence |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Frequent vs. infrequent irrigation are two common irrigation practices. This field study was conducted on 'Providence' creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) grown on a sand-based rootzone and maintained as a putting green. The objectives of this study were to measure several creeping bentgrass performance and physiological factors as influenced by light and frequent (LF) vs. deep and infrequent (DI) irrigation. The LF plots were irrigated daily to moisten the upper 4 to 6 cm of soil, while DI plots were irrigated at leaf wilt to wet soil to a depth of ā„24 cm. The LF-irrigated creeping bentgrass exhibited very good color and quality throughout most of 2006 and 2007, whereas DI-irrigated bentgrass exhibited acceptable quality in 2007 but not in 2006. The DI-irrigated bentgrass had lower chlorophyll levels in leaf and sheath tissue in 2006, but developed better color and quality and had higher chlorophyll levels in late summer of 2007 vs. LF-irrigated bentgrass. Creeping bentgrass subjected to DI irrigation developed a less thick thatchmat layer that contained less organic matter than that found in LF-irrigated plots. Twice the amount of water was applied to the LF- vs. the DI-irrigated plots." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 22 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables
Graphs |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Fu, J., and P. H. Dernoeden. 2009. Creeping bentgrass putting green turf responses to two irrigation practices: Quality, chlorophyll, canopy temperature, and thatch-mat. Crop Sci. 49(3):p. 1071-1078. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=152931 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 152931. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/pdfs/49/3/1071
Last checked: 11/16/2016
Requires: PDF Reader
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cs/articles/49/3/1071
Last checked: 11/16/2016
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2211522a |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
