Full TGIF Record # 155103
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2009-0831-01-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/6/1/2009-0831-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/6/1/2009-0831-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Morton, Debbie E.; Weisenberger, Daniel V.; Reicher, Zachary J.
Author Affiliation:Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Title:Response of eight cultivars of roughstalk bluegrass to bispyribac or sulfosulfuron
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 6, No. 1, December 2009, p. [1-7].
Publishing Information:Plant Management Network
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/6/1/2009-0831-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Bispyribac-sodium; Cultivar evaluation; Herbicide application; Mowing height; Poa annua control; Poa trivialis; Sulfosulfuron; Susceptibility
Cultivar Names:Roughstalk bluegrass
Abstract/Contents:"Bispyribac and sulfosulfuron are labeled for selective control of roughstalk bluegrass (Poa trivialis L.), but previous research indicates inconsistent control. Our primary objective was to determine whether response of bispyribac or sulfosulfuron was consistent among eight cultivars of roughstalk bluegrass. Studies were conducted in Indiana at 1.25 and 5.0 cm mowing heights in 2006 and 2007. Herbicide treatments included an untreated control, sulfosulfuron at 13 g ai/ha per application applied twice on a two-week interval, and bispyribac at 37 g ai/ha per application applied four times on a two-week interval. Herbicide treatments were chosen as the lowest effective application strategy in our previous research. Applications were made in June and July to eight cultivars of mature roughstalk bluegrass. All roughstalk bluegrass cultivars were more susceptible to control from bispyribac than to sulfosulfuron. When mowed at 5.0 cm, there was some indication that 'Laser' or 'Bariviera' may be more susceptible to herbicidal control whereas 'Pulsar' may be more tolerant. This variability did not occur consistently in the two years of study at either mowing height, but this may partly explain variability in control typically seen in roughstalk bluegrass from bispyribac or sulfosulfuron."
Language:English
References:18
Note:"Published 31 August 2009"
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Morton, D. E., D. V. Weisenberger, and Z. J. Reicher. 2009. Response of eight cultivars of roughstalk bluegrass to bispyribac or sulfosulfuron. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 6(1):p. [1-7].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=155103
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 155103.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2009-0831-01-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/6/1/2009-0831-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/6/1/2009-0831-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)