| |
| Web URL(s): | http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2009/53.pdf
Last checked: 01/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Author(s): | Landschoot, Peter;
Fidanza, Michael |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| Title: | Comparison of chlorothalonil, propiconazole, and iprodione products for control of dollar spot and brown patch diseases |
|---|
| Section: | Grant-in-Aid Research Program
Other records with the "Grant-in-Aid Research Program" Section
|
|---|
| Source: | 2009 Turfgrass and Environmental Research Summary. 2009, p. 53. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Far Hills, NJ: United States Golf Association |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 1 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Chlorothalonil; Comparisons; Disease control; Dollar spot; Iprodione; Propiconazole; Rhizoctonia blight
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | Presents a study conducted to "determine if different fungicide products containing chlorothalonil, propiconazole, or iprodione provide differences in control of dollar spot and brown patch diseases of bentgrass maintained as a golf course fairway." Describes the materials and the methods used in the experiment, stating that "two tests were conducted at the central Pennsylvania site: one on creeping bentgrass with a history of severe dollar spot infestations, and the other on colonial bentgrass with a history of moderate dollar spot infestations." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| See Also: | Other Reports from this USGA research project: 2008-18-388 |
|---|
| Note: | Pictures, color |
|---|
| USGA Summary Points: | Iprodione products generally showed better dollar spot control than chlorothalonil and propiconazole products at the central Pennsylvania location. However, in the southeastern Pennsylvania trial, the three different active ingredients were very similar in controlling dollar spot. Generally, chlorothalonil and iprodione products provided better brown patch control than propiconazole products. With one exception (one trial during 2009), chlorothalonil products included in this study performed similarly in controlling dollar spot and brown patch. No differences among propiconazole-containing products were observed with respect to dollar spot control in any of the dollar spot trials. Differences in brown patch control were detected among certain products on one rating date in both years; however, on the majority of rating dates, no differences were detected among propiconazole products. Of the three iprodione products, Chipco 26GT and Ipro 2SE provided the most consistent dollar spot control. Raven showed less dollar spot control in 2008 when compared with Chipco 26GT and Ipro 2SE; but a new formulation of Raven performed similarly to the other iprodione products in 2009. |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Landschoot, P., and M. Fidanza. 2009. Comparison of chlorothalonil, propiconazole, and iprodione products for control of dollar spot and brown patch diseases. Turfgrass Environ. Res. Summ. p. 53. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=159856 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 159856. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/ressum/2009/53.pdf
Last checked: 01/23/2017
Requires: PDF Reader |
| 
MSU catalog number: b3609415 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
