Full TGIF Record # 160061
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2010-0216-01-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/7/1/2010-0216-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/7/1/2010-0216-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Dest, William M.; Guillard, Karl; Rackliffe, Steven L.; Chen, Ming-Hui; Wang, Xia
Author Affiliation:Dest: Associate Extension Professor Emeritus; Guillard: Professor; Rackliffe: Extension Instructor, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; Chen: Professor of Statistics, Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; Wang: Postdoctoral Fellow, National Institute of Statistical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC
Title:Putting green speeds: A reality check!
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 7, No. 1, December 2010, p. [1-9].
Publishing Information:St. Paul, Minnesota: Plant Management Network
# of Pages:9
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/7/1/2010-0216-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Ball roll distance; Golf green speed; Golf greens; Golfer perceptions; Playability; Questionnaire surveys
Abstract/Contents:"Twenty-nine golf courses in Connecticut participated in a study where 448 golfers were asked in a questionnaire to rank the speed of selected greens into one of five categories from slow to fast. These rankings were paired to the same USGA speed chart categories for regular play based on measured Stimpmeter ball-roll distances. Overall, there was no significant (P = 0.72) relationship between golfer rankings of green speed and USGA speed categories. Low-handicap golfers were able to detect increasing trends in green speeds only slightly better than higher-handicap golfers or golfers with no handicap. Overall, the majority of golfers (74%) ranked green speed into slower categories than those determined by the Stimpmeter. However, golfer rankings correctly matched USGA categories in 41.4 to 48.8% of cases when measured speeds were classified as medium to medium-fast, respectively. Regardless of ball-roll distance, 87.5% of respondents rated the putting green speed as satisfactory. The data suggest that use of the Stimpmeter for delineating greens into arbitrary speed categories may be obsolete. Instead, it should be used as a tool to determine "ideal" green speeds at individual golf courses based on golfer preferences, and to ensure relatively uniform green speeds throughout the course."
Language:English
References:10
Note:"Published 16 February 2010."
Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Dest, W. M., K. Guillard, S. L. Rackliffe, M.-H. Chen, and X. Wang. 2010. Putting green speeds: A reality check!. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 7(1):p. [1-9].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=160061
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 160061.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2010-0216-01-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/7/1/2010-0216-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/7/1/2010-0216-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)