Full TGIF Record # 161974
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1002/ps.1835
Web URL(s):http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.1835/full
    Last checked: 01/31/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.1835/pdf
    Last checked: 01/31/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Morales-Rodriguez, Anuar; Ospina, Aracely; Peck, Daniel C.
Author Affiliation:Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experimental Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY
Title:Variation in the laboratory susceptibility of turf-infesting white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to biological, biorational and chemical control products
Section:Research articles
Other records with the "Research articles" Section
Source:Pest Management Science. Vol. 66, No. 1, January 2010, p. 90-99.
Publishing Information:Barking, Essex: Elsevier Science Publishers LTD
# of Pages:10
Related Web URL:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.1835/abstract
    Last checked: 01/31/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Biological control; Biorational control; Chemical control; Control methods; Exomala orientalis; Insect control; Insect profile; Melolonthinae; Popillia japonica; Rhizotrogus majalis; Scarabaeidae; Steinernema scarabaei; Susceptibility; White grub control
Abstract/Contents:"Background: White grubs are the most widespread and damaging pests in turfgrass habitats of the northeast USA, and their management is highly dependent on chemical pesticides. Because this complex includes at least eight species, opportunities for pest management would be enhanced by understanding how susceptibility to control products varies across taxa. The objective of this laboratory study was to measure variation in the susceptibility of four species to 18 biological, biorational and chemical insecticides used as curative controls. Results: Across species, the most efficacious biological and chemical insecticide alternatives were Steinernema scarabaei and chlorpyrifos respectively. For biorational and chemical insecticides, the European chafer [Amphimallon majale (Razoumowsky)] was the least susceptible species. For biologicals, the Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman) was the least susceptible. Considering all control products, the oriental beetle [Anomala orientalis (Waterhouse)] was the most susceptible. Conclusion: The magnitude of variation in susceptibility supports the idea that a single product will not reliably suppress populations of all taxa, and highlights the need for pest management practitioners to identify white grub species before intervention. This differential susceptibility could have broader consequences for grub management if a numerically dominant target species is more completely suppressed than a co-occurring species."
Language:English
References:43
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Morales-Rodriguez, A., A. Ospina, and D. C. Peck. 2010. Variation in the laboratory susceptibility of turf-infesting white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to biological, biorational and chemical control products. Pest Management Science. 66(1):p. 90-99.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=161974
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 161974.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1835
Web URL(s):
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.1835/full
    Last checked: 01/31/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.1835/pdf
    Last checked: 01/31/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2219665
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)