Full TGIF Record # 164174
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://web.archive.org/web/20160212051558/http://www.turfgrasssociety.eu/home/articles/code/270?headline=Nitrogen%20absorption%20and%20movement%20in%20creeping%20bentgrass%20Agrostis%20stolonifera%20as%20affected%20by%20nitrogen%20source%20and%20shade
    Last checked: 08/01/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Nangle, E.; Gardner, D.; Studzinska, A.; Danneberger, K.; Street, J.
Title:Nitrogen absorption and movement in creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera as affected by nitrogen source and shade
Meeting Info.:11-14 April 2010: Angers, Loire Valley, France
Source:2nd European Turfgrass Society Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2, May 21 2010, p. Unknown.
Publishing Information:Angers, France: European Turfgrass Society
# of Pages:0
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Comparisons; Growth analysis; Nitrogen fate; Nitrogen sources; Nitrogen uptake; Shade; Surface quality; Vertical shoot growth
Abstract/Contents:"Shade on turfgrasses leads to leaf elongation and thinning of the turf surface. Management of shaded turf areas is affected by many variables including air movement, the percent shade, the type of shade and time of day. Strategies which have been investigated include the use of growth regulators (Steinke and Stier, 2003; Wherley et al., 2005) and different sources, forms and rates of nitrogen (Goss et al., 2002). The aim of these investigations is to alter plant growth in a way that reduces leaf elongation and reduces loss of surface quality (Beard, 1997). Nitrogen is required for maintaining sufficient turfgrass quality since it is an essential component of many plant compounds required for growth and development (Fry and Huang, 2004). Nitrogen movement into turfgrasses has had minimal investigation and no research has looked at uptake of nitrogen sources in shaded conditions. In full sun (FS) conditions using perennial ryegrass, Bowman and Paul (1992) found that KNO3, (NH2)2CO and (NH4)2SO4 entered at a similar rate when applied to the leaf. This research showed that the partitioning of N varied between leaves and roots. Henning et al., (2009) found a similar result on creeping bentgrass while Stiegler et al., (2009) found that (NH2)2CO was taken up in greater amounts in comparison to other N sources also on creeping bentgrass. It is unknown how these fertilizers act in shaded conditions, however, and the objective of this research was to investigate if there is a difference in nitrogen uptake from foliar fertilizer applications to shaded creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera)."
Language:English
References:Unknown
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Nangle, E., D. Gardner, A Studzinska, K. Danneberger, and J. Street. 2010. Nitrogen absorption and movement in creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera as affected by nitrogen source and shade. Eur. Turfgrass Soc. Conf. Proc. 2:p. Unknown.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=164174
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 164174.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://web.archive.org/web/20160212051558/http://www.turfgrasssociety.eu/home/articles/code/270?headline=Nitrogen%20absorption%20and%20movement%20in%20creeping%20bentgrass%20Agrostis%20stolonifera%20as%20affected%20by%20nitrogen%20source%20and%20shade
    Last checked: 08/01/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: Uncataloged - Ask at TIC
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)