| |
| DOI: | 10.1023/A:1009540018553 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1009540018553
Last checked: 10/04/2017 |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Mcintyre, N. E.;
Knowles-Yánez, K.;
Hope, D. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Mcintyre: Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX; Knowles-Yánez: Liberal Studies Program, California State University, San Marcos, CA; Hope: Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ |
|---|
| Title: | Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of "urban" between the social and natural sciences |
|---|
| Source: | Urban Ecosystems. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2000, p. 5-24. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Andover, Hants U.K.: Chapman and Hall |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 20 |
|---|
| Related Web URL: | http://www.springerlink.com/content/qq74r60624012478/
Last checked: 09/02/2010
Notes: Abstract only |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Ecology; Ecosystems; History; Nomenclature; Population dynamics; Research priorities; Urban habitat
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Though there is a growing appreciation of the importance of research on urban ecosystems, the question of what constitutes an urban ecosystem remains. Although a human-dominated ecosystem is sometimes considered to be an accurate description of an urban ecosystem, describing an ecosystem as human-dominated does not adequately take into account the history of development, sphere of influence, and potential impacts required in order to understand the true nature of an urban ecosystem. While recognizing that no single definition of urban is possible or even necessary, we explore the importance of attaching an interdisciplinary, quantitative, and considered description of an urban ecosystem such that projects and findings are easier to compare, repeat, and build upon. Natural science research about urban ecosystems, particularly in the field of ecology, often includes only a tacit assumption about what urban means. Following the lead of a more developed social science literature on urban issues, we make suggestions towards a consistent, quantitative description of urban that would take into account the dynamic and heterogeneous physical and social characteristics of an urban ecosystem. We provide case studies that illustrate how social and natural scientists might collaborate in research where a more clearly understood definition of urban would be desirable." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 122 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Mcintyre, N. E., K. Knowles-Yánez, and D. Hope. 2000. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of "urban" between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosystems. 4(1):p. 5-24. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=168544 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 168544. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1023/A:1009540018553 |
| Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1009540018553
Last checked: 10/04/2017 |
| 
MSU catalog number: b4896713 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
