Full TGIF Record # 168662
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1007/s11252-008-0048-9
Web URL(s):https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11252-008-0048-9
    Last checked: 10/09/2019
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Cheng, Z.; Richmond, D. S.; Salminen, S. O.; Grewal, P. S.
Author Affiliation:Cheng, Richmond, Salminen and Grewal: Urban Landscape Ecology Program and Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH; Richmond: Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Title:Ecology of urban lawns under three common management programs
Source:Urban Ecosystems. Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2008, p. 177-195.
Publishing Information:Andover, Hants U.K.: Chapman and Hall
# of Pages:19
Related Web URL:http://www.springerlink.com/content/68632v3278824758/
    Last checked: 09/02/2010
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Disease infestations; Land surveys; Lawn maintenance; Maintenance programs; Nematoda; Soil analysis; Urban habitat; Weed density
Abstract/Contents:"Turfgrass lawns are a central part of urban and suburban landscapes throughout North America and are often managed using repeated applications of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. These inputs are expensive and may negatively affect ecological processes in lawns. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of three most common lawn care programs on ecological characteristics of turfgrass lawns. Twenty-eight home lawns, separated into 3 groups based on the lawn care program (professional, do-it-yourself [DIY], and no-input), were studied. Data on lawn quality, weed and insect infestation, disease incidence, soil nematode community, soil nitrogen pools, microbial biomass (MBN), and soil organic matter (SOM) were collected. Results indicated that professional lawn care resulted in the highest aesthetic lawn quality mainly due to better weed control, compared to DIY and no-input programs. However, professional and DIY programs negatively affected MBN and SOM pools and enhanced disease (rust) severity. No significant differences in soil nematode population and nematode community indices across the three programs were found, indicating no differences in net ecosystem productivity among the three programs. Overall, soil nematode food web in turfgrass lawns represented a disturbed food web compared to natural grasslands and forest ecosystems, irrespective of the lawn care program used."
Language:English
References:47
Note:Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Cheng, Z., D. S. Richmond, S. O. Salminen, and P. S. Grewal. 2008. Ecology of urban lawns under three common management programs. Urban Ecosystems. 11(2):p. 177-195.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=168662
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 168662.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-008-0048-9
Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11252-008-0048-9
    Last checked: 10/09/2019
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b4896713
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)