Full TGIF Record # 168748
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1023/A:1026157629609
Web URL(s):https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1026157629609
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Quigley, Martin F.
Author Affiliation:Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Title:Franklin Park: 150 years of changing design, disturbance, and impact on tree growth
Source:Urban Ecosystems. Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2002, p. 223-235.
Publishing Information:Andover, Hants U.K.: Chapman and Hall
# of Pages:13
Related Web URL:http://www.springerlink.com/content/m733k51171714313/
    Last checked: 09/03/2010
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Case studies; Greenspace; Land use; Parks; Tree environmental factors; Trees; Urban habitat
Geographic Terms:Franklin Park |l Columbus, Ohio
Abstract/Contents:"Urban stresses are known to affect street trees growing in spatially restricted conditions, but even in relatively large parks the cumulative effects by construction, pedestrian uses, and impacts from temporary events may have deleterious long-term effects on plant health. In Columbus, Ohio, the 93 ac (42.3 ha) Franklin Park has been subjected to major construction events and site re-configuration about once per generationat least six times in 150 years. The first recorded shade- and ornamental tree installations occurred between 1895 and 1910. Those trees, as well as those native to the park, were mapped in 1939, 1989, and again in 2000. Testing the hypothesis that cumulative disturbance reduces tree vigor and growth rate even in open-grown conditions, tree diameters were compared over the sixty year period between 1939 and 2000. Soil compaction and percolation were measured on a 50mgrid, and maps were overlain to determine where site disturbance, buildings, utility lines, paths and pavements had occurred since 1860. Only 8% of the parks surface escaped disturbance; undisturbed areas occurred only in isolated patches. For all trees, trunk diameter increase averaged 0.5 cm/year for 61 years. While late successional species (e.g., Quercus, Acer) had growth rates less than expected for open-grown specimens, many early successional species (Celtis, Populus) were less affected. Despite availability of soil nutrients and lack of canopy or understory competition, tree health was generally poor in all size classes and the majority of the trees present in 1939 were in decline by 2000."
Language:English
References:27
Note:Pictures, color
Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Quigley, M. F. 2002. Franklin Park: 150 years of changing design, disturbance, and impact on tree growth. Urban Ecosystems. 6(3):p. 223-235.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=168748
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 168748.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026157629609
Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1026157629609
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b4896713
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)