Full TGIF Record # 169639
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1094/ATS-2010-0914-01-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/7/1/2010-0914-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/7/1/2010-0914-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Guertal, E. A.
Author Affiliation:Professor, Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, AL
Title:Fertilization of bentgrass with commercial foliar products: Greenhouse evaluations
Section:Applied turfgrass research
Other records with the "Applied turfgrass research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 7, No. 1, December 2010, p. 1-10.
Publishing Information:St. Paul, Minnesota: Plant Management Network
# of Pages:10
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/7/1/2010-0914-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Dry weight; Fertilizer evaluation; Foliar feeding; High maintenance; NPK fertilizers; Nitrogen uptake; Root growth rate
Abstract/Contents:Foliar application of plant nutrients is often used in turfgrass management, especially on high-maintenance turfed areas. Foliar fertilizers for turfgrass are often sold as liquids with a complete analysis (containing N, P, and K), and may also contain calcium, magnesium, micronutrients, with the nutrient sources obtained from various chelates, minerals, or other sources such as glucoheptonates, sea kelp, or humic materials. The objective of this greenhouse study was to examine the relative performance of nine different commercially available foliar fertilizers applied to creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) maintained at putting green heights, focusing on root and top growth, and nitrogen uptake. Three greenhouse studies were performed, two of 1-week duration and the other 3 weeks in length. In all studies, foliar fertilizers were applied at the same N rate, and clipping harvests with subsequent tissue N analyses were conducted. There were differences in N uptake and dry matter yield due to foliar fertilizer source, but none of the differences were consistent across experiments due to source. In most cases foliar application of urea was as effective (for N uptake and dry matter yield) as applying any of the commercial materials. Application of any foliar fertilizer improved N uptake and dry matter yield over that measured in the unfertilized bentgrass.
Language:English
References:22
Note:"Published 14 September 2010."
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Guertal, E. A. 2010. Fertilization of bentgrass with commercial foliar products: Greenhouse evaluations. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 7(1):p. 1-10.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=169639
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 169639.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2010-0914-01-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/7/1/2010-0914-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/7/1/2010-0914-01-RS
    Last checked: 03/05/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)