Full TGIF Record # 171451
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
    Last checked: 03/04/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
    Last checked: 03/04/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Xu, Chenping; Huang, Bingru
Author Affiliation:Dep. of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ
Title:Comparative analysis of drought responsive proteins in Kentucky bluegrass cultivars contrasting in drought tolerance
Section:Crop physiology & metabolism
Other records with the "Crop physiology & metabolism" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 50, No. 6, November 2010, p. 2543-2552.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:10
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Comparisons; Cultivar variation; Drought resistance; Electrolyte leakage; Energy metabolism; Gel electrophoresis; Mechanism of resistance; Photochemical efficiency; Poa pratensis; Protein characterizations; Relative water content
Cultivar Names:Midnight; Brilliant
Abstract/Contents:"Knowledge of drought-responsive proteins is critical for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance. The objective of this study was to identify drought-responsive proteins associated with drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) by comparing proteomic responses to drought stress in two cultivars differing in drought tolerance. Plants of drought-tolerant 'Midnight' and drought-sensitive 'Brilliant' were subjected to drought stress by withholding irrigation for 15 d in growth chambers. Midnight maintained significantly higher relative water content and photochemical efficiency and lower membrane leakage than Brilliant under drought stress. Difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry analyses detected 88 drought-responsive proteins in both cultivars. Many proteins involved in amino acid or energy metabolism were downregulated under drought stress in both cultivars, but most of those proteins had higher abundance in Midnight than in Brilliant. Several heat shock proteins and chaperons exhibited differential accumulation between the two cultivars, with an increase in the abundance of 70 kDa proteins in Midnight and decreases of 60 kDa chaperonin and FtsH proteins in Brilliant under drought stress. The differential accumulation of those proteins involved in amino acid and energy metabolism, as well as for protein chaperons, could be associated with drought tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass."
Language:English
References:50
See Also:Other items relating to: Disasters - Drought
Note:Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Xu, C., and B. Huang. 2010. Comparative analysis of drought responsive proteins in Kentucky bluegrass cultivars contrasting in drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 50(6):p. 2543-2552.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=171451
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 171451.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
    Last checked: 03/04/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0152
    Last checked: 03/04/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2211522a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)