Full TGIF Record # 187679
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
Web URL(s):https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
    Last checked: 03/29/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
    Last checked: 03/29/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Williams, Bradley T.; Kruse, Jason K.; Unruh, J. Bryan; Sartain, Jerry B.
Author Affiliation:Williams and Kruse: Dep. of Environmental Horticulture, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Unruh: Dep. of Environmental Horticulture, Univ. of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, Milton, FL; Sartain: Dep. of Soil and Water Science, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Title:An enhanced method of tracking divot recovery in turfgrass
Section:Turfgrass science
Other records with the "Turfgrass science" Section
Source:Crop Science. Vol. 51, No. 5, September 2011, p. 2194-2198.
Publishing Information:Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America
# of Pages:5
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Analytical methods; Cynodon dactylon; Divot recovery; Divots; Image analysis; Topdressings
Abstract/Contents:"Divot recovery research has shown to have a great deal of resulting variability making it difficult to draw any solid conclusions about responses to differences among species, cultivars, or cultural practices. Standard divot analysis of the white divot (SDA) uses photos of a divot over time and digital image analysis (DIA) software to calculate percent recovery based on the number of green pixels in the photo. This method, however, neglects to take into account any nongreen pixels outside of the divoted area that result from external factors. A new method of analysis was developed using pink colored sand to fill divots and altering the macro to determine the percentage of pink pixels in the photo. Two divots were created per plot in bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.]. One divot was backfilled with United States Golf Association spec white topdressing sand and analyzed using the SDA method. The other divot was backfilled with pink colored sand and analyzed using both the standard divot analysis of the pink divot (SDAP) method as well as the pink sand analysis (PSA) method. Each divot was also visually analyzed for percent recovery. Results indicated that the PSA method increased precision when compared with standard methods. At the time when divots were visually determined to be fully recovered, SDA and SDAP reported 60 to 70% recovery, whereas PSA reported recovery above 99%. Pink sand analysis reduced variability, as validated by a reduction in standard errors and increased R2 values, and increased the speed of analysis."
Language:English
References:11
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Williams, B. T., J. K. Kruse, J. B. Unruh, and J. B. Sartain. 2011. An enhanced method of tracking divot recovery in turfgrass. Crop Sci. 51(5):p. 2194-2198.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=187679
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 187679.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
Web URL(s):
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
    Last checked: 03/29/2024
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2135/cropsci2010.11.0647
    Last checked: 03/29/2024
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2211522a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)