Full TGIF Record # 19952
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900040006x
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/19/4/JEQ0190040663
    Last checked: 12/12/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Gross, C. M.; Angle, J. S.; Welterlen, M. S.
Author Affiliation:Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD
Title:Nutrient and sediment losses from turfgrass
Source:Journal of Environmental Quality. Vol. 19, No. 4, October-December 1990, p. 663-668.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
# of Pages:6
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/abstracts/19/4/JEQ0190040663
    Last checked: 12/12/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Soil pollution; Water pollution; Leaching; Surface runoff; Losses from soil systems
Abstract/Contents:"The contribution of turfgrass fertilizer to surface and groundwater pollution is not well documented. two studies, at separate locations, were therefore intitiated to examine losses of nutrients and sediment via leaching and runoff from turfgrass. Treatment included fertilizer applied in a liquid and granular form and an unfertilized control. Sodded tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)/Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) plots were fertilized at a rate of 220 kg N ha-1 yr-1 in metered applications of urea. Runoff was collected and analyzed for volume, suspended and soluble solids, NH4-N, NO3-N, total N, PO4-P, total soluble P, and total P. Runoff losses of total N were significantly (P ā‰¤ 0.05) higher when comparing the liquid and granular treatments to the control, although there was no difference between fertilizer treatments. Losses for all forms of P and sediment did not significantly differ with regard to treatment. Soil percolate (0.75 m depth) was collected monthly from the various treatments. Percolate NO3-N concentrations from the liquid and granular treatments did not differ significantly, although both were significantly higher than the untreated control. Soil cores (2.1 m depth) were collected every spring and fall in 0.30-m increments. Nitrate-N concentrations generally decreased with depth; however, the granular treatment exhibited a higher soil NO3-N concentration than either the liquid or control treatments. These results indicate that when compared with agronomic row crops, nutrient and sediment losses from turf via runoff, and leaching are very low."
Language:English
References:25
See Also:See also related article "Evidence mounts: Properly maintained turf does not significantly contribute to contamination" Golf Course Management, 59(3) March 1991, p. 130, R=20551. R=20551
See Also:Other items relating to: RUNOFF

Other items relating to: LEACH
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Gross, C. M., J. S. Angle, and M. S. Welterlen. 1990. Nutrient and sediment losses from turfgrass. J. Environ. Qual. 19(4):p. 663-668.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=19952
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 19952.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900040006x
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/jeq/pdfs/19/4/JEQ0190040663
    Last checked: 12/12/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: S 900 .J6
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
   Physical sequential file in TIC.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)