| |
| Web URL(s): | http://www.wsweedscience.org//wp-content/uploads/proceedings-archive/2012.pdf#page=23
Last checked: 12/10/2013
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a limited access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Report |
|---|
| Content Type: | Abstract or Summary only |
|---|
| Author(s): | Alms, Jill K.;
Moechnig, Mike J.;
Vos, Dave A.;
Deneke, Darrell L. |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD |
|---|
| Title: | Yellow toadflax control with fall herbicide applications |
|---|
| Section: | Project 1: Weeds of range and natural areas
Other records with the "Project 1: Weeds of range and natural areas" Section
|
|---|
| Meeting Info.: | Reno, Nevada: March 12-15, 2012 |
|---|
| Source: | Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science:Western Society of Weed Science Annual Meeting 2012. Vol. 65, 2012, p. 23-24. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Newark, California: Western Society of Weed Science |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 2 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Aminocyclopyrachlor; Application rates; Application timing; Herbicide evaluation; Linaria vulgaris; Weed control
|
|---|
| Trade Names: | DPX-MAT28 |
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) has become a troublesomeinvasive weed in pastures, roadsides, and turf throughout eastern South Dakota and in the Black Hills in western SD. Picloram and chlorsulfuron are currently registered for yellow toadflax control. Aminocyclopyrachlor has been effective in several previous studies. Therefore, the objective of these studies was to identify the optimal aminocyclopyrachlor rate and herbicide application timing for yellow toadflax control. Dose response trials were established in 2009 and 2010 and were evaluated one to two years after application. Results from these trials indicated that the minimum aminocyclopyrachlor rate to consistantly achieve at least 85% control for two years after application. In another study, aminocyclopyrachlor (175 g ae/ha), picloram (560g ae/ha), and chlorsulfuron (65 g ai/ha) were applied in August, September, or October 2010 and yellow toadflax control was evaluated in August, 2011. Picloram resulted in 15-80% control and was most effective if applied in Sept. or Oct. whereas chlorsulfuron resulted in 15-28% control and was most effective if applied in Sept. Picloram + chlorsulfuron was more effective than either product applied alone (53 - 84% control) and was most effective if applied in Sept. or Oct. Aminocyclopyrachlor was the most effective herbicide resulting in greater than 97% control regardless of application date. Therefore, results from this study demonstrated that aminocyclopyrachlor may be more efective on yellow toadflax than picloram or chlorsulfuron and may be less affected by application timing in fall." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 0 |
|---|
| Note: | This item is an abstract only! |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Alms, J. K., M. J. Moechnig, D. A. Vos, and D. L. Deneke. 2012. Yellow toadflax control with fall herbicide applications. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 65:p. 23-24. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=211678 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 211678. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| Web URL(s):
http://www.wsweedscience.org//wp-content/uploads/proceedings-archive/2012.pdf#page=23
Last checked: 12/10/2013
Requires: PDF Reader
Notes: Item is within a limited access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: b2224583a |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by file name: pwsws2012 |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
