Full TGIF Record # 211678
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.wsweedscience.org//wp-content/uploads/proceedings-archive/2012.pdf#page=23
    Last checked: 12/10/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Alms, Jill K.; Moechnig, Mike J.; Vos, Dave A.; Deneke, Darrell L.
Author Affiliation:South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD
Title:Yellow toadflax control with fall herbicide applications
Section:Project 1: Weeds of range and natural areas
Other records with the "Project 1: Weeds of range and natural areas" Section
Meeting Info.:Reno, Nevada: March 12-15, 2012
Source:Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science:Western Society of Weed Science Annual Meeting 2012. Vol. 65, 2012, p. 23-24.
# of Pages:2
Publishing Information:Newark, California: Western Society of Weed Science
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Aminocyclopyrachlor; Application rates; Application timing; Herbicide evaluation; Linaria vulgaris; Weed control
Trade Names:DPX-MAT28
Abstract/Contents:"Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) has become a troublesomeinvasive weed in pastures, roadsides, and turf throughout eastern South Dakota and in the Black Hills in western SD. Picloram and chlorsulfuron are currently registered for yellow toadflax control. Aminocyclopyrachlor has been effective in several previous studies. Therefore, the objective of these studies was to identify the optimal aminocyclopyrachlor rate and herbicide application timing for yellow toadflax control. Dose response trials were established in 2009 and 2010 and were evaluated one to two years after application. Results from these trials indicated that the minimum aminocyclopyrachlor rate to consistantly achieve at least 85% control for two years after application. In another study, aminocyclopyrachlor (175 g ae/ha), picloram (560g ae/ha), and chlorsulfuron (65 g ai/ha) were applied in August, September, or October 2010 and yellow toadflax control was evaluated in August, 2011. Picloram resulted in 15-80% control and was most effective if applied in Sept. or Oct. whereas chlorsulfuron resulted in 15-28% control and was most effective if applied in Sept. Picloram + chlorsulfuron was more effective than either product applied alone (53 - 84% control) and was most effective if applied in Sept. or Oct. Aminocyclopyrachlor was the most effective herbicide resulting in greater than 97% control regardless of application date. Therefore, results from this study demonstrated that aminocyclopyrachlor may be more efective on yellow toadflax than picloram or chlorsulfuron and may be less affected by application timing in fall."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Alms, J. K., M. J. Moechnig, D. A. Vos, and D. L. Deneke. 2012. Yellow toadflax control with fall herbicide applications. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 65:p. 23-24.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=211678
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 211678.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.wsweedscience.org//wp-content/uploads/proceedings-archive/2012.pdf#page=23
    Last checked: 12/10/2013
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a limited access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2224583a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by file name: pwsws2012
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)