Full TGIF Record # 223319
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2013jou593.pdf
    Last checked: 07/06/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
Access Restriction:Certain MSU-hosted archive URLs may be restricted to legacy database members.
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):McGroary, P. C.; Cisar, J. L.; Snyder, G. H.; Erickson, J. E.; Nangle, E. J.
Author Affiliation:McGroary, Cisar, Snyder and Nangle: Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Erickson: Agronomy Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Title:Comparison of soil test kits for assessing plant available phosphorus in Florida urban soils
Section:Soil biology, chemistry and plant nutrition
Other records with the "Soil biology, chemistry and plant nutrition" Section
Meeting Info.:Beijing, China: July 14-19, 2013
Source:International Turfgrass Society Research Journal. Vol. 12, 2013, p. 593-595.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: International Turfgrass Society
# of Pages:3
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Fertilizer regulations; Phosphorus fertilizers; Product evaluation; Soil testing; USEPA; Urban soils
Abstract/Contents:"The Department of Environmental Protection in Florida has limited fertilizer phosphorus (P) applications to urban lawns in Florida to 12 kg P2O5 ha-1 per application and no more than 25 kg P2O5 ha-1 annually. However, additional applications of P fertilizer are allowed if soils test "low" for available P. A cost effective and a convenient way to test soils for nutrients uses soil test kits. However, soil kits vary in the extractive agent and their rating levels. One problem with this is that one test kit may suggest that the soil is high in P another test may suggest the same soil is low in P. This disparity in soil test kits may lead to unwarranted P fertilizer applications. Therefore, the objective of the this experiment was to compare soil P results of three different commercial soil test kits to Mehlich-1 P which is used by the University of Florida soil testing lab. Poor relationships were observed between the soil test kits and Mehlich-1 P. Furthermore, poor relationships where observed for soil P between each of the soil test kits. Soil test kits indicated low P in 70% of the soils tested while Mehlich-1 only indicated low P in 10% of the same samples. In conclusion, the soil test kits tested in this study were not a reliable way of predicting the need for P fertilization in Florida urban lawns."
Language:English
References:18
Note:Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
McGroary, P. C., J. L. Cisar, G. H. Snyder, J. E. Erickson, and E. J. Nangle. 2013. Comparison of soil test kits for assessing plant available phosphorus in Florida urban soils. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 12:p. 593-595.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=223319
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 223319.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/its/articles/2013jou593.pdf
    Last checked: 07/06/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2394179
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)