Full TGIF Record # 237900
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1007/s12283-011-0061-8
Web URL(s):https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12283-011-0061-8/fulltext.html
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12283-011-0061-8.pdf
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Twomey, Dara; Otago, Leonie; Saunders, Natalie
Author Affiliation:School of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, University of Ballarat, Mt Helen, VIC, Australia
Title:The effects of testing procedure on critical fall height determination for third generation synthetic turf
Source:Sports Engineering. Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2011, p. 145-151.
Publishing Information:[Oxford, England]: Blackwell Science
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12283-011-0061-8
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Critical fall height; Infilled artificial turf; Safety; Testing
Abstract/Contents:"Test procedures and their accuracy in determining critical fall height (CFH) on sporting grounds are paramount to player safety. The procedure currently adopted for synthetic turf in Australian football [1] consists of four consecutive drops at various drop heights at three test locations on the sample. The quantity and packing of the infill in third-generation turf and the pooling effect of the rubber particles with consecutive drops suggests that the current standard protocol may need re-assessment. Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study was to investigate whether current methods of testing for CFH are appropriate for third-generation synthetic turf or whether an alternative or adapted method needs to be developed. CFH was measured, using a HISUN Uniaxe-II Impact Tester, on 12 combinations of synthetic turf samples (four different products with three shock pad options). Three conditions were investigated on each sample; the existing protocol; an alternative 12 single-drop protocol and four single drops from the CFH determined from the existing protocol. A significant difference was found for both absolute and percentage difference between the existing and 12 single-drop protocol, with p = 0.001 and t = 4.33 and p < 0.001 and t = 6.03, respectively. There was also a significant difference between the CFH reached with and without a shock pad for both the existing protocol and the 12 single-drop protocol. The results of this pilot study demonstrate that differences do occur with alterations to the existing protocol and highlight the need for a more detailed characterisation of testing methods on third-generation synthetic turf and the response of surfaces to them."
Language:English
References:20
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Twomey, D., L. Otago, and N. Saunders. 2011. The effects of testing procedure on critical fall height determination for third generation synthetic turf. Sports Engineering. 13(3):p. 145-151.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=237900
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 237900.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1007/s12283-011-0061-8
Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12283-011-0061-8/fulltext.html
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12283-011-0061-8.pdf
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b7245814
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)