Full TGIF Record # 242035
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1007/s12283-013-0146-7
Web URL(s):https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12283-013-0146-7/fulltext.html
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12283-013-0146-7.pdf
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Nunome, Hiroyuki; Inoue, Koichiro; Shinkai, Hironari; Kozakai, Rumi; Suito, Hiroshi; Ikegami, Yasuo
Author Affiliation:Nunome and Ikegami: Research Centre of Health, Physical Fitness and Sports; Inoue: Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Nagoya; Shinkai: Faculty of Education, Art and Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata; Kozakai: Department of Sport Education, Hokusho University, Ebetsu; Suito: Faculty of Pyschological and Physical Fitness, Aichi Gakuin University, Nisshin, Japan
Title:A novel comparison between standard and new testing procedures to assess shock absorbency of third generation artificial turfs
Source:Sports Engineering. Vol. 17, No. 2, June 2014, p. 103-112.
# of Pages:10
Publishing Information:[Oxford, England]: Blackwell Science
Related Web URL:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12283-013-0146-7
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Artificial turf; Evaluative methods; Impact tests; Surface hardness
Abstract/Contents:"This study aims to re-examine to what extent the testing procedure of the Artificial Athlete Berlin (DIN18032) is a valid evaluation method to assess the shock absorbency of third generation artificial turf (3-g turf) and to establish a new testing procedure, which precisely reflects the acute load by human sports action. The DIN test was conducted for 3-g turfs with different infill component. The baseline of the load of acute human sports action was obtained from the ground reaction force underneath the standard type of 3-g turf sample during landing from a 55-cm height with minimal shock attenuation. For reproducing the force similar to such a hard landing, a testing rig was developed and the same 3-g turf samples were tested. The DIN test failed to distinguish most types of 3-g turf and was found to be inappropriate to evaluate the shock absorbency of the 3-g turf mainly due to bouncing actions of the test foot on measured samples. In contrast, the newly developed testing rig succeeded in illustrating the differences of shock attenuation properties among most types of 3-g turfs in a high loading condition. In terms of players' safety, the necessity of high loading test using an alternative testing procedure was highlighted."
Language:English
References:31
Note:Figures
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Nunome, H., K. Inoue, H. Shinkai, R. Kozakai, H. Suito, and Y. Ikegami. 2014. A novel comparison between standard and new testing procedures to assess shock absorbency of third generation artificial turfs. Sports Engineering. 17(2):p. 103-112.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=242035
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 242035.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1007/s12283-013-0146-7
Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12283-013-0146-7/fulltext.html
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12283-013-0146-7.pdf
    Last checked: 10/05/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b7245814~S39a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)