| |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00212280 |
Web URL(s): | https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00212280.pdf Last checked: 10/06/2017 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
Publication Type:
| Refereed |
Author(s): | Leonas, Karen K.;
Yu, Xiao Kun |
Author Affiliation: | Textiles, Merchandising and Interiors, Dawson Hall, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia |
Title: | Deposition patterns on garments during application of lawn and garden chemicals: A comparison of six equipment types |
Source: | Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Vol. 23, No. 2, August 1992, p. 230-234. |
Publishing Information: | Berlin: Springer-Verlag |
# of Pages: | 5 |
Related Web URL: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00212280 Last checked: 10/06/2017 Notes: Abstract only |
Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Applicator safety; Chemical applicators; Comparisons; Equipment evaluation; Pesticide safety; Protective clothing; Spray drift; Sprayers
|
Abstract/Contents: | "The deposition pattern produced on the clothing of the operator during typical lawn and garden maintenance was identified in this study. The application was completed using water (for spray applications) and fertilizer (for granular applications) mixed with fluorescein dye as a tracer. Six types of application equipment were used to apply the dye mixtures to turf in timed and measured walks. The deposition patterns and the level of deposition on the operators clothing produced by each equipment type were determined. Fluorescein dye was used to provide visual evidence of exposure. The quantity of dye deposited at various body locations was measured, using an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer. The deposition pattern and the total amount deposited were dependent on the type of equipment used for application. Overall, those pieces of equipment where a liquid spray was produced resulted in greater deposition levels than the equipment using a granular product. Contamination from the low volume application and the adjustable garden hose end sprayer equipment was significantly higher than all other pieces of equipment. The amount of contamination also varied by body area with the feet, lower legs, and upper legs receiving the greatest amount of deposition." |
Language: | English |
References: | 9 |
Note: | Figures Tables |
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete): Leonas, K. K., and X. K. Yu. 1992. Deposition patterns on garments during application of lawn and garden chemicals: A comparison of six equipment types. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 23(2):p. 230-234. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=244648 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 244648. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
| DOI: 10.1007/BF00212280 |
| Web URL(s): https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00212280.pdf Last checked: 10/06/2017 Requires: PDF Reader Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| MSU catalog number: b2223822 |
| Find from within TIC: Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |