Full TGIF Record # 244648
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1007/BF00212280
Web URL(s):https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00212280.pdf
    Last checked: 10/06/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Leonas, Karen K.; Yu, Xiao Kun
Author Affiliation:Textiles, Merchandising and Interiors, Dawson Hall, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Title:Deposition patterns on garments during application of lawn and garden chemicals: A comparison of six equipment types
Source:Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Vol. 23, No. 2, August 1992, p. 230-234.
Publishing Information:Berlin: Springer-Verlag
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00212280
    Last checked: 10/06/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Applicator safety; Chemical applicators; Comparisons; Equipment evaluation; Pesticide safety; Protective clothing; Spray drift; Sprayers
Abstract/Contents:"The deposition pattern produced on the clothing of the operator during typical lawn and garden maintenance was identified in this study. The application was completed using water (for spray applications) and fertilizer (for granular applications) mixed with fluorescein dye as a tracer. Six types of application equipment were used to apply the dye mixtures to turf in timed and measured walks. The deposition patterns and the level of deposition on the operators clothing produced by each equipment type were determined. Fluorescein dye was used to provide visual evidence of exposure. The quantity of dye deposited at various body locations was measured, using an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer. The deposition pattern and the total amount deposited were dependent on the type of equipment used for application. Overall, those pieces of equipment where a liquid spray was produced resulted in greater deposition levels than the equipment using a granular product. Contamination from the low volume application and the adjustable garden hose end sprayer equipment was significantly higher than all other pieces of equipment. The amount of contamination also varied by body area with the feet, lower legs, and upper legs receiving the greatest amount of deposition."
Language:English
References:9
Note:Figures
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Leonas, K. K., and X. K. Yu. 1992. Deposition patterns on garments during application of lawn and garden chemicals: A comparison of six equipment types. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 23(2):p. 230-234.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=244648
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 244648.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00212280
Web URL(s):
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00212280.pdf
    Last checked: 10/06/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2223822
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)