Full TGIF Record # 245120
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.jstor.org/stable/4041826
    Last checked: 06/18/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/4041826.pdf
    Last checked: 06/18/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Foote, L. E.; Himmelman, B. F.
Author Affiliation:Foote: Director of Environmental Services; Himmelman: Office Engineer of Contract Administration, Department of Highways, State of Minnesota, St. Paul
Title:MH as a roadside grass retardant
Source:Weed Science. Vol. 19, No. 1, January 1971, p. 86-90.
Publishing Information:Champaign, Illinois: Weed Science Society of America
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4041826
    Last checked: 06/18/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: 2,4-D; Ambrosia; Application timing; Digitaria; Growth regulator evaluation; Herbicide combinations; Herbicide evaluation; Maleic hydrazide; Plant growth regulators; Setaria
Trade Names:MH
Abstract/Contents:"MH (1,2-dihydro-3,6-pyridazinedione) was applied at 4 to 6 lb/A, in spring and fall, with and without (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D), on roadsides normally mowed from 2 to 12 times a year. MH at 6 lb/A applied in spring generally reduced grass height. Lower rates and fall applications were generally ineffective. Depending on area, rural or urban, and retardant effectiveness, between zero and five mowings per year were saved. When the MH was effective and the turf was not strong and vigorous, annual weeds such as crabgrass (Digitaria spp. Heist.), foxtail (Setaria spp. Beauv.), and ragweed (Ambrosia spp. L.) often increased and gave the roadside an undesirable appearance. When MH was used without 2,4-D, the roadside generally had a poorer appearance than when not treated. When MH was applied with 2,4-D and no application 'skips' or annual weed infestation occurred, the roadside sometimes had a satisfactory appearance. The time when MH can be effectively applied is short (about 2 weeks). Rains, winds, and springtime roadway work make proper timing of applications difficult under Minnesota conditions. Applications of 2,4-D alone or with MH were effective in reducing roadside weeds."
Language:English
References:8
Note:Pictures, b/w
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Foote, L. E., and B. F. Himmelman. 1971. MH as a roadside grass retardant. Weed Sci. 19(1):p. 86-90.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=245120
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 245120.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4041826
    Last checked: 06/18/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/4041826.pdf
    Last checked: 06/18/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2203399a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)