Full TGIF Record # 249510
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2010.073783
Web URL(s):http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/11/794.full.pdf
    Last checked: 10/16/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/11/794.full
    Last checked: 10/29/2014
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Bjørneboe, John; Bahr, Roald; Andersen, Thor Einar
Author Affiliation:Department of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norweigan School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
Title:Risk of injury on third-generation artificial turf in Norwegian professional football
Source:British Journal of Sports Medicine. Vol. 44, No. 11, September 2010, p. 794-798.
Publishing Information:Loughborough, UK: British Association of Sport and Medicine
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/11/794
    Last checked: 10/29/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Artificial turf; Athletic injuries; Injurious factors; Natural versus artificial turf; Soccer fields; Sports turf safety
Geographic Terms:Norway
Abstract/Contents:"Background Artificial turf is used extensively in both recreational and elite football in areas with difficult climatic conditions. Objective To compare the risk for acute injuries between natural grass (NG) and third-generation artificial turf (3GAT) in male professional football. Study design Prospective cohort study. Methods All injuries sustained by players with a first-team contract were recorded by the medical staff of each club, from the 2004 throughout the 2007 season. An injury was registered if the player was unable to take fully part in football activity or match play. Results A total of 668 match injuries, 526 on grass and 142 on artificial turf, were recorded. The overall acute match injury incidence was 17.1 (95% CI 15.8 to 18.4) per 1000 match hours; 17.0 (95% CI 15.6 to 18.5) on grass and 17.6 (95% CI 14.7 to 20.5) on artificial turf. Correspondingly, the incidence for training injuries was 1.8 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.0); 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.0) on grass and 1.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.2) on artificial turf respectively. No significant difference was observed in injury location, type or severity between turf types. Conclusion No significant differences were detected in injury rate or pattern between 3GAT and NG in Norwegian male professional football."
Language:English
References:19
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Bjørneboe, J., R. Bahr, and T. E. Andersen. 2010. Risk of injury on third-generation artificial turf in Norwegian professional football. Brit. J. Sports Med. 44(11):p. 794-798.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=249510
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 249510.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073783
Web URL(s):
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/11/794.full.pdf
    Last checked: 10/16/2014
    Requires: PDF Reader
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/44/11/794.full
    Last checked: 10/29/2014
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: RC 1200 .B7
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)