| |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.10.010 |
|---|
| Web URL(s): | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244011004506
Last checked: 10/17/2014
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
|---|
| Publication Type:
| Refereed |
|---|
| Author(s): | Ball, Kevin;
Hrysomallis, Con |
|---|
| Author Affiliation: | Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, School of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia |
|---|
| Title: | Synthetic grass cricket pitches and ball bounce characteristics |
|---|
| Source: | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Vol. 15, No. 3, May 2012, p. 272-276. |
|---|
| Publishing Information: | Belconnen, Australia: Sports Medicine Australia |
|---|
| # of Pages: | 5 |
|---|
| Keywords: | TIC Keywords: Ball rebound resilience; Ball roll measurement; Cricket pitches; Natural versus artificial turf; Playability
|
|---|
| Abstract/Contents: | "The use of synthetic grass cricket pitches is becoming more common at club and sub-elite levels which constitute the majority of cricket participants but there is sparse data on ball bounce characteristics on these surfaces. Objectives To compare the speed, angle and consistency of ball bounce on two types of synthetic cricket surfaces, the Traditional and the All-Seasons, and compare these ball bounce characteristics with published data for natural turf pitches. Design Group-based comparison. Methods High speed motion analysis was used to capture data from balls projected onto the cricket pitches from a bowling machine at three speeds: slow (47 km h-1), medium (72 km h-1) and fast (104 km h-1). Both ends of the cricket pitches were assessed and two types of balls were used: 2-piece and 4-piece leather cricket balls. Digitisation was used to determine the ball speed and angle pre and post bounce and then to calculate the ratios of ball speed and angle. Consistency was determined by the coefficient of variation. Results The All-Seasons synthetic surface generated a lower speed ratio and a higher angle ratio than the Traditional synthetic surface. The speed ratio for the Traditional surface fell within the range reported for natural turf, whilst the value for the All-Seasons surface was outside the range. Both synthetic surfaces produced angle ratios greater than those for natural turf surfaces. Conclusions Differences were detected between the different synthetic cricket surfaces and also when compared to natural turf. This variability may have implications for skill development as well as safety." |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| References: | 10 |
|---|
| Note: | Tables
Graphs |
|---|
| ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Ball, K., and C. Hrysomallis. 2012. Synthetic grass cricket pitches and ball bounce characteristics. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 15(3):p. 272-276. |
| Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=249533 |
| If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 249533. |
| Choices for finding the above item: |
|---|
| DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.10.010 |
| Web URL(s):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244011004506
Last checked: 10/17/2014
Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website |
| 
MSU catalog number: b5179055 |
| Find from within TIC:
Digitally in TIC by record number. |
| Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record) |
