Full TGIF Record # 249661
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.019
Web URL(s):http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244006000430
    Last checked: 10/20/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Ford, Kevin R.; Manson, Neil A.; Evans, Blake J.; Myer, Gregory D.; Gwin, Richelle C.; Heidt, Robert S. Jr.; Hewett, Timothy E.
Author Affiliation:Ford, Evans, Myer, and Hewett: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center, Human Performance Laboratory; Manson, Gwin, Evans, and Heidt: Wellington Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine; Hewett: University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Orthopaedic Surgery
Title:Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf
Column Name:Biomechanics
Other records with the "Biomechanics" Column
Source:Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Vol. 9, No. 6, December 2006, p. 433-440.
Publishing Information:Belconnen, Australia: Sports Medicine Australia
# of Pages:8
Related Web URL:http://www.jsams.org/article/S1440-2440%2806%2900043-0/abstract
    Last checked: 10/20/2014
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Foot injuries; Footwear; Natural versus artificial turf; Surface hardness
Abstract/Contents:"Synthetic playing surfaces with rubber or sand infill are now used on many athletic fields such as soccer, football and rugby. Although these surfaces may come closer to the mechanical characteristics of a true grass playing surface than the older turf designs, their potential effects on lower extremity biomechanics and related injury rates necessitate further study. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two surfaces (natural grass versus turf) on in-shoe foot loading patterns during cutting. Seventeen male football players were tested on a slalom course. An in-shoe pressure distribution measurement insole was used in the right shoe (14 stud, molded cleat) of each athlete. Individual cutting steps were extracted from each slalom trial and peak pressure and relative load calculated in nine distinct plantar regions of the foot. The turf condition had significantly higher peak pressures within the central forefoot (turf: 646.6 ± 172.6 kPa, grass: 533.3 ± 143.4 kPa, P = 0.017) and lesser toes (turf: 429.3 ± 200.9 kPa, grass: 348.1 ± 119.0 kPa, P = 0.043) compared to grass. In contrast, the relative load within the medial forefoot (turf: 27.2 ± 5.3%, grass: 30.2 ± 6.6%, P = 0.031) and lateral midfoot (turf: 3.4 ± 1.8%, grass: 4.1 ± 2.3%, P = 0.029) were higher during the grass condition. No differences between the grass and turf were found in maximal effort sprint times performed prior to the testing trials. This study demonstrates that playing surface significantly affects plantar loading during sport related activities. Further epidemiological investigation is warranted to determine the effects of playing surfaces on sport specific injury mechanisms."
Language:English
References:23
Note:Pictures, b/w
Figures
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Ford, K. R., N. A. Manson, B. J. Evans, G. D. Myer, R. C. Gwin, R. S. Jr. Heidt, et al. 2006. Comparison of in-shoe foot loading patterns on natural grass and synthetic turf. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 9(6):p. 433-440.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=249661
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 249661.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.03.019
Web URL(s):
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244006000430
    Last checked: 10/20/2014
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b5179055
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)