Full TGIF Record # 258915
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/593.pdf#page=67
    Last checked: 05/12/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Young, Joey; Richardson, Mike; Karcher, Doug
Author Affiliation:Richardson and Karcher: Editor, Arkansas Turfgrass Report 2010; Richardson: Professor; Karcher: Associate Professor; Young, Richardson, and Karcher: University of Arkansas, Department of Horticulture, Fayetteville, Ark.
Title:Effects of mowing, rolling, and foot traffic on quality and coverage of creeping bentgrass putting greens
Section:Turf culture
Other records with the "Turf culture" Section
Source:Arkansas Turfgrass Report 2010. April 2012, p. 67-73.
Publishing Information:Fayetteville, Arkansas: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture
# of Pages:7
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Golf greens; Heat stress; Image analysis; Mowing; Percent living ground cover; Quality evaluation; Rolling; Traffic; Visual evaluation
Cultivar Names:SR 1020; Penn G-2
Abstract/Contents:"Previous studies have demonstrated reduced turf quality when grasses are mowed at lower heights or subjected to heavy traffic. These results may be exacerbated in cool-season grasses during summer months due to increased environmental stresses. Although low mowing heights and heavy traffic have been evaluated as individual factors, research is lacking on the effect of turf quality when these stress factors are combined. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of mowing height (0.100, 0.125, or 0.156 inch bench height setting), rolling frequency (0, 3, or 6 days per week), and foot traffic on turf quality and coverage of two creeping bentgrass cultivars (SR 1020 and Penn G-2) managed as a putting green. Initially, the highest mowing height had the worst turf quality for both cultivars due to the overabundance of foliar tissue that reduced uniformity. Penn G-2 plots mowed at 0.125 inch had higher turf quality ratings in July and September compared to plots maintained at 0.156 inch, whereas SR 1020 plots at the highest height maintained better turf quality than lower mowing heights on those dates. Significant differences in turfgrass coverage were not observed until the final month, although there was a large reduction in coverage from June to July. Therefore, treatment differences in September may have occurred due to slowing recovery rather than physical damage or injury due to treatments."
Language:English
References:2
Note:"Research Series 593"
Summary appears as abstract
Pictures, color
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Young, J., M. Richardson, and D. Karcher. 2012. Effects of mowing, rolling, and foot traffic on quality and coverage of creeping bentgrass putting greens. Ark. Turfgrass Rep. p. 67-73.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=258915
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 258915.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://arkansasagnews.uark.edu/593.pdf#page=67
    Last checked: 05/12/2015
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Notes: Item is within a single large file
Find Item @ MSU
TIC Vertical - Serials
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)