Full TGIF Record # 266784
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://scisoc.confex.com/crops/2015am/webprogram/Paper92386.html
    Last checked: 11/09/2015
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Jia, Xinhua
Author Affiliation:North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
Title:Comparison of measured and modeled evapotranspiration rates for turfgrass in North Dakota
Section:ASA section: Climatology & modeling
Other records with the "ASA section: Climatology & modeling" Section

Symposium--Model simulation comparisons with experimental observations of evapotranspiration
Other records with the "Symposium--Model simulation comparisons with experimental observations of evapotranspiration" Section
Meeting Info.:Minneapolis, Minnesota: November 15-18, 2015
Source:ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2015, p. 92386.
Publishing Information:[Milwaukee, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy and the Entomological Society of America]
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Comparisons; Evapotranspiration rate; Growth factors; Regional variation; Seasonal variation; Soil moisture sensors; Soil water movement; Water requirements
Geographic Terms:North Dakota
Abstract/Contents:"Limited research has been done to determine the actual evapotranspiration (ET) rate for turfgrass water requirement in North Dakota. With a higher water demand following the North Dakota oil boom and the increase in population, precision irrigation scheduling for turfgrass with an up-to-date crop coefficient (Kc) and reference ET method is urgently needed. In this project, an Eddy Covariance (EC) system and two sets of soil moisture (SM) sensors were used to measure actual ET rates at a cool grass surface at North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network (NDAWN) Fargo station site in 2011-2014. The NDAWN site is a grass area of 0.5 ha, surrounded by agricultural lands with various crops. Using reference ET estimated with Jensen-Haise (ET[underscore]JH) method and Penman-Monteith grass (ETo) and alfalfa (ETr) methods, new Kc values can be developed from the ratio of measured to reference ET values using the four year's data. Comparing the measured ET rates (EC and SM methods) with the modeled ET rates (product of the newly developed Kc values and the three reference ET values) as well as the traditionally modeled ET rates (0.85ET[underscore]JH), the biggest ET difference was found in spring time when wind speed was high. Though the annual amount of turfgrass water demand is similar between the measured and the modeled ET methods, the seasonal ET variations can provide a better understanding of turfgrass water requirements and effective ways to conserve water in turfgrass irrigation."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"268-5"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Jia, X. 2015. Comparison of measured and modeled evapotranspiration rates for turfgrass in North Dakota. Agron. Abr. p. 92386.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=266784
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 266784.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://scisoc.confex.com/crops/2015am/webprogram/Paper92386.html
    Last checked: 11/09/2015
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)