Full TGIF Record # 269624
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2134/ATS-2014-0037-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/11/1/ATS-2014-0037-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/11/1/ATS-2014-0037-RS
    Last checked: o3/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Fry, Jack D.; Kruse, Jason K.
Author Affiliation:Fry: Dep. of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS; Kruse: Environmental Horticulture Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Title:Applicator and Primo effects on the persistence of painted golf course water hazard and out-of-bounds lines on bermudagrass
Section:Brief
Other records with the "Brief" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 11, No. 1, December 2014, p. 1-6.
Publishing Information:St. Paul, Minnesota: Plant Management Network
# of Pages:6
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/11/1/ATS-2014-0037-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Application methods; Color retention; Colorants; Comparisons; Cynodon; Marking; Out of bounds markers; Regional variation; Trinexapac-ethyl; Water hazards
Trade Names:Primo
Abstract/Contents:"Paint applied as an aerosol has been the standard in marking water hazards and out-of-bounds lines on golf courses. Experiments were conducted in Citra, FL and Manhattan, KS to compare aerosol treatments to paint applied in bulk with a backpack applicator or sport field line applicator, with or without the inclusion of the growth regulator Primo (active ingredient trinexapac ethyl), for persistence of water hazard and out-of-bounds lines on bermudagrass. Regardless of applicator type, no water hazard or out-of-bounds line retained acceptable color intensity longer than 5 weeks. Applying red paint in bulk with Primo through the backpack sprayer or sport field line applicator resulted in lines that provided a lateral water hazard line of acceptable color intensity for about 16 and 8 days longer in Florida and Kansas, respectively, compared to aerosol-applied paint. Likewise, white paint applied with Primo to mark out-of-bounds lines with a backpack applicator persisted about 6 days longer in Florida than that applied with an aerosol. Enhancing line intensity and persistence with bulk paint that is lower in price compared to aerosol paint, combined with Primo, may be of interest to golf course superintendents and others responsible for marking water hazard and out-of-bounds lines on golf courses."
Language:English
References:3
See Also:Updated version appears in Golf Course Management, 84(6) June 2016, p. 80-85, R=272593. R=272593
Note:Pictures, color
Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Fry, J. D., and J. K. Kruse. 2014. Applicator and Primo effects on the persistence of painted golf course water hazard and out-of-bounds lines on bermudagrass. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 11(1):p. 1-6.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=269624
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 269624.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2134/ATS-2014-0037-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/11/1/ATS-2014-0037-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/11/1/ATS-2014-0037-RS
    Last checked: o3/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)