Full TGIF Record # 269625
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2134/ATS-2014-0032-RS
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/11/1/ATS-2014-0032-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/11/1/ATS-2014-0032-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Schmid, Charles J.; Gaussoin, Roch E.; Shearman, Robert C.; Mamo, Martha; Wortmann, Charles S.
Author Affiliation:Dep. of Agronomy and Horticulture, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Title:Cultivation effects on organic matter concentration and infiltration rates of two creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting greens
Section:Research
Other records with the "Research" Section
Source:Applied Turfgrass Science. Vol. 11, No. 1, December 2014, p. 1-7.
Publishing Information:St. Paul, Minnesota: Plant Management Network
# of Pages:7
Related Web URL:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/abstracts/11/1/ATS-2014-0032-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Agrostis stolonifera; Comparisons; Cultivation methods; Evaluations; Golf greens; Hollow tine versus solid tine coring; Hydroject; Infiltration; Organic matter accumulation; Soil cultivation; Ventilation
Cultivar Names:Providence
Abstract/Contents:"Soil cultivation is commonly used to manage organic matter (OM) accumulation in golf course putting greens. Our objectives were to determine: (i) if hollow-tine cultivation is more effective than solid-tine cultivation at managing OM and water infiltration, (ii) if venting methods are effective at managing OM and water infiltration, and (iii) if venting alters or interacts with effects of early- or late-season cultivation. The study was a 3 × 5 factorial repeated on two 'Providence' creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) research putting greens. Tine treatments were hollow-tine, solid-tine, or no-tine cultivation. Venting treatments were Hydroject, PlanetAir, quad needle tine, bayonet tine, or no venting. Soil samples were collected and analyzed for OM content using loss on ignition. Water infiltration rates were determined in situ. After 2 years, there were few consistent differences found among the tine and venting treatments, and there were no significant interactions regarding OM concentration. This response was attributed to the small amount of surface area impacted by cultivation and to the equalization of topdressing quantity across all treatment combinations. Hollow-tine and solid-tine cultivation increased infiltration compared with no cultivation. In general, Hydroject treatments increased water infiltration rates more than all other venting treatments regardless of tine treatment."
Language:English
References:30
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Schmid, C. J., R. E. Gaussoin, R. C. Shearman, M. Mamo, and C. S. Wortmann. 2014. Cultivation effects on organic matter concentration and infiltration rates of two creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting greens. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 11(1):p. 1-7.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=269625
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 269625.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2134/ATS-2014-0032-RS
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/articles/11/1/ATS-2014-0032-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/11/1/ATS-2014-0032-RS
    Last checked: 03/08/2016
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)