Full TGIF Record # 278189
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2016am/webprogram/Paper99444.html
    Last checked: 11/22/2016
Publication Type:
i
Report
Content Type:Abstract or Summary only
Author(s):Straw, Chase M.; Henry, Gerald M.; Grubbs, Becky
Author Affiliation:Straw and Hery: University of Georgia-Athens, Athens, GA; Grubbs: Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia-Athens, Athens, GA
Title:Handheld vs. mobile data acquisition for spatial analysis of natural turfgrass sports fields
Section:Turfgrass management poster
Other records with the "Turfgrass management poster" Section

C05 turfgrass science
Other records with the "C05 turfgrass science" Section
Meeting Info.:Phoenix, Arizona: November 6-9, 2016
Source:ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings. 2016, p. 99444.
Publishing Information:[Milwaukee, Wisconsin]: [American Society of Agronomy and the Entomological Society of America]
# of Pages:1
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Compaction; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Penetration value; Regional variation; Volumetric water content
Abstract/Contents:"Research compared handheld and mobile data acquisitions of soil moisture (VWC), soil compaction (penetration resistance), and turfgrass vigor (NDVI) of four natural turfgrass sports fields using two sampling grid sizes (4.8 x 4.8 m and 4.8 x 9.6 m). Differences between the two sampling grid sizes were minimal, indicating that sampling with handheld devices using a 4.8 x 9.6 m grid (120-130 samples) would achieve results similar to the smaller grid size. Central tendencies and data distributions varied among the handheld and mobile devices. Moderate to strong correlation coefficients were observed for VWC and NDVI; however, weak to moderate correlation coefficients were observed for penetration resistance at three of the four locations. Kriged maps of VWC and NDVI displayed similar patterns of variability between handheld and mobile devices, but at different magnitudes. Spatial maps of penetration resistance were inconsistent due to device design and user reliability. Consequently, mobile devices may provide the most reliable results for penetration resistance of natural turfgrass sports fields."
Language:English
References:0
Note:This item is an abstract only!
"169-1713"
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Straw, C. M., G. M. Henry, and B. Grubbs. 2016. Handheld vs. mobile data acquisition for spatial analysis of natural turfgrass sports fields. Agron. Abr. p. 99444.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=278189
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 278189.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2016am/webprogram/Paper99444.html
    Last checked: 11/22/2016
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)