Full TGIF Record # 278834
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.2134/agronj2016.06.0329
Web URL(s):https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/articles/108/6/2245
    Last checked: 12/08/2016
Publication Type:
i
Refereed
Author(s):Alvarez, Guillermo; Sevostianova, Elena; Serena, Matteo; Sallenave, Rossana; Leinauer, Bernhard
Author Affiliation:Alvarez: Dep. of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM; Sevostianova, Serena, and Leinauer: Dep. of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM; Sallenave: Dep. of Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, NM
Title:Surfactant and polymer-coated sand effects on deficit irrigated bermudagrass turf
Section:Agronomy, soils & environmental quality
Other records with the "Agronomy, soils & environmental quality" Section
Source:Agronomy Journal. Vol. 108, No. 6, November/December 2016, p. 2245-2255.
Publishing Information:Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy
# of Pages:11
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Cynodon dactylon; Deficit irrigation; Hydrophobic soils; Percent living ground cover; Polymers; Quality evaluation; Sand topdressings; Surfactants
Cultivar Names:Princess 77
Abstract/Contents:"Sand topdressing and soil surfactants are commonly applied to turfgrass areas but it is unclear whether these practices improve visual appearance or reduce hydrophobicity under deficit irrigation. A study was conducted from 2011 to 2013 at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces, NM, to evaluate two topdressing materials and a soil surfactant on deficit irrigated Princess 77 bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) grown on a loamy sand (mixed, thermic Typic Torripsamment). Treatments consisted of monthly applications of a polymer-coated hydrophilic sand (ACA 3114) or straight sand with or without the soil surfactant and an untreated control. Plots were mowed at 2.0 cm and irrigated at either 70 or 50% of reference evapotranspiration for short grass (ETos). When results were averaged over the research period, plots irrigated at 50% ETos and receiving ACA 3114 or sand topdressing and the soil surfactant exhibited greater green coverage (85.3 and 88.2%, respectively) and better turfgrass quality (6.6 and 6.5, respectively, with 1 = worst, 9 = best) than control plots (71.6% green coverage, quality = 5.1) or plots receiving sand topdressing only (74.7% green coverage, quality = 5.3). Soil repellency in the upper root zone was detected only in 2011, and applications of both ACA 3114 and straight sand topdressing with the soil surfactant on plots irrigated at 50% ETos resulted in lower water drop penetration times (7s and 1s) compared to sand topdressing (12s) only. Our results suggest that bermudagrass quality can be maintained under deficit irrigation if either topdressed with a hydrophilic sand or with straight sand combined with a surfactant."
Language:English
References:49
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Alvarez, G., E. Sevostianova, M. Serena, R. Sallenave, and B. Leinauer. 2016. Surfactant and polymer-coated sand effects on deficit irrigated bermudagrass turf. Agron. J. 108(6):p. 2245-2255.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=278834
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 278834.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2016.06.0329
Web URL(s):
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/aj/articles/108/6/2245
    Last checked: 12/08/2016
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2212646a
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)