Full TGIF Record # 280493
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1122.12
Web URL(s):http://www.actahort.org/members/showpdf?session=16640
    Last checked: 02/07/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Landschoot, P. J.; Liu, B.
Author Affiliation:Dept. Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Title:Tolerance of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) cultivars to simulated fall traffic
Section:Sports fields' facilities management
Other records with the "Sports fields' facilities management" Section
Meeting Info.:XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustainable Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes: III International Conference on Turfgrass Management and Science for Sports Fields, Brisbane, Australia: 20-22 August 2014
Source:Acta Horticulturae. Vol. 1122, 2016, p. 91-95.
Publishing Information:Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science
# of Pages:5
Related Web URL:http://www.actahort.org/books/1122/1122%5F12.htm
    Last checked: 02/07/2017
    Notes: Abstract only
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Autumn; Comparisons; Cultivar evaluation; Lolium perenne; Traffic simulation; Variety trials; Wear resistance
Trade Names:Brinkman Traffic Simulator
Abstract/Contents:"Perennial ryegrass is used widely for sports turf surfaces in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Although many cultivars of perennial ryegrass are available to sports turf managers, little is known about their relative tolerance to traffic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of 88 cultivars from the 2010 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program Perennial Ryegrass Test to a program of intensive simulated fall traffic using a Brinkman Traffic Simulator. Percent ground cover of traffic and no-traffic plots were assessed during 2011 and 2012 using digital images taken prior to initiation of traffic treatments, at the conclusion of traffic treatments in fall, and the following spring. Results of fall traffic tolerance (difference between percent ground cover assessments before and after fall traffic treatments) showed the main effect of traffic treatment was significant (P≤0.001). However, the main effect of cultivar and the cultivar × traffic interaction were not significant (P≤0.66 and P≤0.88, respectively) when data from 2011 and 2012 were combined. All cultivars showed good recovery from traffic treatments in spring (expressed as the difference between percent ground cover after traffic in fall and percent ground cover following a recovery period in spring). Four cultivars, 'A-35', 'BAR Lp 7608', 'CS-PR66', and 'PSRX-4CAGL', showed higher recovery values than 'Sienna', a stoloniferous ryegrass. No differences were detected between these five cultivars and the other 83 cultivars. The lower recovery value of 'Sienna' was probably a result of having the highest percentage of ground cover in late fall, and the four other cultivars having low ground cover values in late fall."
Language:English
References:13
Note:ISBN: 978-9066055-22-3
Tables
Graphs
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Landschoot, P. J., and B. Liu. 2016. Tolerance of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) cultivars to simulated fall traffic. Acta Horticulturae. 1122:p. 91-95.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=280493
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 280493.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1122.12
Web URL(s):
http://www.actahort.org/members/showpdf?session=16640
    Last checked: 02/07/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b5848521
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)