Full TGIF Record # 289945
Item 1 of 1
Web URL(s):http://www.irrigation.org/IA/FileUploads/IA/Resources/TechnicalPapers/2012/EvaluationOfETBasedSmartControllersDuringDroughts.pdf
    Last checked: 10/09/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
Publication Type:
i
Proceedings
Author(s):Swanson, Charles; Fipps, Guy
Author Affiliation:Swanson: Extension Program Specialist-Landscape Irrigation, Texas Agrilife Extension Service-Biological & Agricultural Engineering Unit, College Station, Texas; Fipps: Professor and Extension Agricultural and Engineer Director, Irrigation Technology Center, Texas A&M System, Texas Agrilife Extension Service-Biological & Agricultural Engineering Unit, College Station, Texas
Title:Evaluation of ET based "smart" controllers during droughts
Section:Turf
Other records with the "Turf" Section
Source:Irrigation Show 2012: Technical Session Proceedings. 2012, p. 1-15.
Publishing Information:[Falls Church, Virginia]: [Irrigation Association]
# of Pages:15
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Climate-based controllers; Drought management; Equipment evaluation; Evapotranspiration; Irrigation controllers; Irrigation efficiency; Irrigation scheduling; Water conservation
Abstract/Contents:"A smart controller testing facility was established by the Irrigation Technology Center at Texas A&M University in College Station in 2008. The objectives were to (1) evaluate smart controller testing methodology and to (2) determine their performance and reliability under Texas conditions from an end-user point of view. The end-user is considered to be the landscape or irrigation professional (such as the Licensed Irrigator in Texas) installing the controller. This report summaries the performance of eight smart controllers over an eight month (238 day) growing season in 2010. Controllers were programmed based on a virtual landscape that evaluated controller performance using multiple plant types (flowers, turf, groundcover, small and large shrubs), soil types (sand, loam and clay), root zone depths (3 to 20 inches) and other site specific characteristics. Controllers were divided into 2 categories, those which utilize on-site sensors to calculate or adjust ET or runtimes; and those which ET values are sent via cellular, radio or the internet. Controller performance was compared to total ETo, plant water requirement (ETc) and the weekly irrigation recommendation of the TexasET Network (http://TexasET.tamu.edu). Results so far indicate that controllers using on-site sensors for calculating irrigation water requirements produced lower water requirements and were more often within the irrigation recommendations of the TexasET Network. Significant seasonal differences in controller performance were also found. Results also indicate problems in quantifying effective rainfall, particularly when using a rain sensor. Continued evaluation of ET based controllers is needed to identify the causes of inconsistency among controllers."
Language:English
References:5
Note:Tables
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Swanson, C., and G. Fipps. 2012. Evaluation of ET based "smart" controllers during droughts. p. 1-15. In Irrigation Show 2012: Technical Session Proceedings. [Falls Church, Virginia]: [Irrigation Association].
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=289945
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 289945.
Choices for finding the above item:
Web URL(s):
http://www.irrigation.org/IA/FileUploads/IA/Resources/TechnicalPapers/2012/EvaluationOfETBasedSmartControllersDuringDroughts.pdf
    Last checked: 10/09/2017
    Requires: PDF Reader
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b9924931
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)