Full TGIF Record # 294146
Item 1 of 1
DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.006
Web URL(s):https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204606000752#!
    Last checked: 01/18/2018
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Publication Type:
i
Report
Author(s):Kirkpatrick, J. B.; Daniels, G. D.; Zagorski, T.
Author Affiliation:School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Title:Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Source:Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 79, No. 3-4, March 2 2007, p. 314-322.
# of Pages:9
Publishing Information:Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier
Keywords:TIC Keywords: Economic factors; Evaluations; Ornamental gardens; Regional variation; Trees; Urban habitat
Abstract/Contents:"This paper determines the relationships between the dependent variables, presence of trees in front garden and front garden type, and socio-economic, environmental and demographic variables, at the suburb scale in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Garden type, largely following a pre-existing classification, and the presence/absence of trees, were recorded from 50 randomly located front gardens in each of 31 suburbs. The suburbs were classified into four groups on the basis of their spectrum of garden types and the percentage frequency of trees. Group one consisted of coastal suburbs of relatively high socio-economic status. Group 2 consisted of suburbs of moderate socio-economic status. Group 3 consisted of the poorest suburbs. The fourth group was composed of suburbs of high socio-economic status, located close to the centre of the city in hilly terrain. All except the rarest garden type occurred in all four groups of suburbs. Multiple regression and general linear models were used to predict tree presence, and the prevalence of particular garden types at the suburb level. Household income was the best predictor of the percentage frequency of trees in front gardens. The variables that appeared in models for garden types were: the percentage of the population with tertiary education (four instances); percentage of population older than 65 years (4); household income (3); percentage of households renting dwellings (3); altitude (3), rainfall (3); unemployment rate (2); percentage of population born in Australia (2); percentage of medium-sized gardens (2); suburb age (1); percentage of workforce in professional and managerial occupations (1). The 12 garden types that could be modelled responded individualistically to these independent variables."
Language:English
References:26
Note:Maps
Tables
Geographic Terms:Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
ASA/CSSA/SSSA Citation (Crop Science-Like - may be incomplete):
Kirkpatrick, J. B., G. D. Daniels, and T. Zagorski. 2007. Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landscape Urban Plan. 79(3-4):p. 314-322.
Fastlink to access this record outside TGIF: https://tic.msu.edu/tgif/flink?recno=294146
If there are problems with this record, send us feedback about record 294146.
Choices for finding the above item:
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.006
Web URL(s):
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204606000752#!
    Last checked: 01/18/2018
    Access conditions: Item is within a limited-access website
Find Item @ MSU
MSU catalog number: b2322641
Find from within TIC:
   Digitally in TIC by record number.
Request through your local library's inter-library loan service (bring or send a copy of this TGIF record)